ICSID自主性与国际投资争端范式转变——以《ICSID示范条款》为例  

ICSID Independence and Paradigm Transformation of International Investment Disputes——Take the"ICSID Center Model Clause"as an Example

作　　者：王桂玲[1] Wang Guiling

机构地区：[1]广东司法警官职业学院

出　　处：《仲裁研究》2023年第1期114-125,共12页Arbitration Study

摘　　要：ICSID仲裁是当今国际投资争端解决的主要方式。创设初期的ICSID仲裁机制原本是契约仲裁,20世纪90年代后该机制转型为条约仲裁。现有研究仅将条约仲裁作为研究背景,少有研究国际投资争端范式转变的动因和路径。本文通过运用国际组织自主性理论分析ICSID仲裁机制,得出以下结论:国际投资争端解决中心(ICSID)是国际法授予的有独立法律人格的国际政治行为体,其自主性权威源于专业权威、道义权益以及世界银行的资源。ICSID秘书处在组织利益驱动下,主动通过起草国家“书面同意”的《ICSID示范条款》进行议程设置。之后,国际官僚通过说服方式倡导国家将《ICSID示范条款》加入双边投资协定;双边投资协定网络扩散进而引发国际投资争端范式转变。ICSID arbitration is the main system for the settlement of international investment disputes today.The initial ICSID arbitration mechanism was originally contract arbitration.After the 1990s,the mechanism was transformed into treaty arbitration.However,the existing research only takes treaty arbitration as the research background,and there are few studies on the motivation and path of the paradigm shift of international investment disputes.Through the analysis of the ICSID arbitration mechanism using the theory of the autonomy of international organizations,the following conclusions are drawn:ICSID is an international political actor with independent legal personality granted by international law.Its autonomy and authority originates from professional authority,moral rights and the resources of the World Bank.Driven by the interests of the organization,the ICSID Secretariat took the initiative to set the agenda by drafting the"ICSID Model Clauses"with"written consent"by the country.Later,international bureaucrats advocated countries to join ICSID model clauses to bilateral investment treaties through persuasion.As the network of bilateral investment treaties proliferated,the paradigm shift in international investment disputes was triggered.

关 键 词：ICSID仲裁 国际投资争端范式 国际组织自主性 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]