论治安调解制度中的行政裁量  

Administrative Discretion in the Public-Order-Related Mediation System

作　　者：陈颖[1] Chen Ying(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海201620

出　　处：《上海公安学院学报》2024年第3期25-36,共12页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：治安调解作为公安机关维护社会秩序、化解民间纠纷的一种职权行为和替代处罚的治安案件处理方式,可引入行政裁量理论对实务中的适用问题进行研究。通过阐明治安调解的起因要件、行为要件、情节要件、意愿要件规制调解过程中的要件裁量,通过确立优先适用调解原则规制调解过程中的效果裁量。治安调解效果裁量的前提是建立在案件事实满足四个法定事实要件的基础上的。跳出传统的二元格局,以程序裁量方法构建丰富多元的行政裁量体系,借鉴行政处罚裁量基准的经验制定治安调解实质性裁量基准,可为实务中破解治安调解制度的困境提供可行的突破口。The public-order-related mediation as police agencies'authorized behavior aims to maintain social order,solve disputes between civilians,and replace penalty to handle public-order-related cases.It can use the theory of administrative discretion to study some issues in practice.This paper elucidates the causal elements,behavioral elements,circumstance elements,and willingness elements of public-order-related mediation so as to regulate the discretionary elements in the mediation process,and to establish the prioritized principle so as to regulate the discretionary effects in the mediation process.The premise for determining the effectiveness of public-order-related mediation is based on the fact that the case meets the four legal factual requirements.This paper,which breaks away from the traditional binary pattern and sets up a rich and diverse administrative discretion system and draws on the experience of administrative penalty discretion standards by means of procedural discretion methods to formulate substantive discretion standards for such mediation,can provide an accessible institutional breakthrough for the dilemma of the public-order-related mediation system in practice.

关 键 词：治安调解 程序裁量 裁量基准 适用条件 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]