提供虚假证明文件涉受贿条款修改之检视  

Review on the Amendment of Clause about Providing False Documents for Bribery

作　　者：彭辅顺[1] Peng Fushun

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院

出　　处：《地方立法研究》2024年第4期47-63,共17页Local Legislation Journal

摘　　要：基于1997年《刑法》第229条第2款的立法缺陷和受贿犯罪的立法发展,《中华人民共和国刑法修正案(十一)》对该款规定的故意提供虚假证明文件涉受贿行为进行了修正,将其定罪处罚的条件从“提供虚假证明文件罪法定刑升格”修改为“依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚”。从立法学角度分析,这一修改试图纠正立法缺陷,但却引发了新的问题:该款中的“依照处罚较重的规定定罪处罚”的适用条件与刑法分则中其他类似条款的普遍性适用条件不一致;此外,该款牵连犯的处断规则与刑法分则其他法定牵连犯的处断规则不一致,造成了该款牵连犯内部、该款牵连犯与其他法定牵连犯之间,以及该款牵连犯与其他条款规定的想象竞合犯之间的罪刑失衡。从刑法释义学角度分析,该款规定的罪数处断条件的表述与实际处断规则不符,导致在解释时难以确定具体的罪数形态。因此,有必要进一步修改该款规定的处断规则及其适用条件的表述,以实现罪刑均衡和法律适用的一致性。The second paragraph of Article 229 of the Criminal Law amended by the Criminal Law Amendment(11)changed the conviction and punishment of deliberately providing false supporting documents involving bribery from the definite crime and punishment to be judged by choosing one felony.It is inconsistent with the universal legal application conditions of being judged by choosing one felony stipulated in other articles of the sub rules and inconsistent with the judgment rules of other statutory implicated offenders.It cannot realize the balance of crime and punishment between the implicated offender itself,between the implicated offender and other statutory implicated offenders,or between the implicated offender and imaginative concurrence.The expression of the applicable conditions stipulated in the instruction of this paragraph is inconsistent with the rules of punishment,which forms many difficulties in interpretation.Therefore,it is necessary to modify the expression of the handling rule and its applicable condition stipulated in this clause.

关 键 词：提供虚假证明文件 受贿 牵连犯 从一重罪处断 罪刑均衡 

分 类 号：D924.392[政治法律—刑法学]