关中本《争座位帖》的早拓本、精拓本和涂描本  

The Guanzhong-Modeled Calligraphy Rubbings of‘Contending for the Seat of Honor'Periodized into Early,Fine and Ink-Refilled Copies

作　　者：王祎[1] Wang Yi

机构地区：[1]故宫博物院书画部

出　　处：《故宫博物院院刊》2024年第7期85-96,142,共13页Palace Museum Journal

基　　金：2023年度国家社会科学基金艺术学重大项目“晋唐宋元书画的价值阐释与保护传承研究”(项目编号:23ZD12)中期成果。

摘　　要：关中本《争座位帖》由于摹刻精好,传世拓本众多,故很有必要对这些拓本之时代进行甄别。本文从存世的三本“出”字未损本入手,对关中本《争座位帖》的历代拓本进行排列、比对,辨析前人记录不一致的考据字,尝试厘清历代拓本的考据特征。明清之际,基于关中本帖石的笔画基本保存完好,人们运用浓墨精细的拓法来得到艺术价值不逊于宋拓的精拓本。与此同时,也有人在捶拓时将关中本早期的考据字进行涂描,将拓本充作早期的宋、明旧拓,在涂描过程中,有的还运用了精拓本的拓法,因此进一步增加了对关中本的鉴别难度。This thesis starts with the intact character of‘出'in three different versions to periodize the Guanzhong-modeled calligraphy rubbings of Contending for the Seat of Honor(争座位帖)into Early,Fine,Ink-Refilled Copies in chronological sequence.The people of the Ming and Qing dynasties applied dense ink and delicate techniques to the making of rubbing based on the Guanzhong-modeled rubbing-stone bearing the clear strokes of characters,and artistically attained as much as the fine works of the Song Dynasty.The ink-refilled rubbings were made to pass off as the earlier ones of the Song and Ming dynasties.A third is the fine copy that employs the process with tracing and rubbing.

关 键 词：关中本 “出”字未损 戏鸿堂本 精拓 涂描 

分 类 号：J292.1[艺术—美术] G894[文化科学—体育学]