刑事诉讼程序的必要迟延  

Necessary Delay of Criminal Procedure

作　　者：程绍燕 CHENG Shaoyan

机构地区：[1]北京市应用法学研究中心

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第5期57-69,共13页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：诉讼进程的“妥速”包括了快速审判和必要迟延两个方面,然而理论界和实务界都对快速审判给予了高度关注,却忽视了必要迟延的价值。必要迟延来源于公正审判,并可进一步细分为权力推进型、权利保障型、合意型三类。我国刑事诉讼法中的必要迟延存在着权力主导型迟延必要性不足、缺乏迟延的权利保障意识、合意型迟延的价值未被充分挖掘等问题。相应地,应从规制、确权、扩容三个方面进行制度完善,包括修改完善非必要迟延条文、规定明确的迟延条件和迟延时间、赋予当事人申请复议复核的救济权利,重建正当事由型迟延制度、明确规定最短诉讼期间、建立必要迟延权利实现的保障制度,扩大附条件不起诉的适用范围、增加暂缓判决制度。The recent criminal procedure reforms in China have focused on improving litigation efficiency,and the academia has paid more attention to speedy trial and is against slow trial.All the academic papers were about speedy trial,even though have realized that criminal procedure should be carried out at appropriate speed.The appropriate speed of the criminal procedure includes speedy trial and necessary delay.Necessary delay provides a new vision for researching the criminal procedure.This article uses the method of the combination of macro and micro perspectives,not only proposing the concept of necessary delay,analyzing the value and justification of necessary delay,and identifying the problems caused by neglecting delays but also analyzing the application of the concept of necessary delay in specific systems.The appropriate speed of criminal procedure includes speedy trial and necessary delay,meanwhile,speedy trial has been a high concern,but the value of necessary delay was ignored.Necessary delay originates from fair trial,and includes power driven,rights protection,and consensus.There is a lack of necessity in the power driven type,a lack of rights protection awareness,and the value of consensus type was not mined in the necessary delay in China's Criminal Procedural Law.So,it should be improved from three aspects of constraint,confirmation,and expansion,which include revising unnecessary delay legal terms,stipulating the condition and duration of necessary delay,and empowering the parties with the right of relief for the power driven type;rebuilding good cause delay system,stipulating the minimum proceeding period,and establishing security system of necessary delay rights for the rights protection type;and expanding application scope of conditional non-prosecution and adding a system for suspending judgments for the consensus type.Compared to previous literature,this article creates new research topics.It proposes the concept of necessary delay against the background of speedy trial,being wary of the excessive

关 键 词：必要迟延 必要迟延权 权力主导型 权利保障型 合意型 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]