检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程洋 CHENG Yang
机构地区:[1]黑龙江大学法学院
出 处:《河北法律职业教育》2024年第7期94-98,共5页HEBEI VOCATIONAL EDUCATION OF LAW
摘 要:面对国内与国际接轨的经济大循环驱动,长期合同对于商事交往的重要性日渐显现,但是我国目前法律规范对长期合同相关法律关系仍然以普通合同法律关系的规范加以调整。适用普通合同规范对长期合同进行调整,这显然忽略了长期合同相较于普通合同的特殊地位。既不能准确把握合同目的,也不能维护合同的公平正义。在长期合同的履行过程中会存在敲竹杠等因一方难以脱身导致的显失公平的情形。因此要探究长期合同的理论地位、司法调整等相关研究,并且要总结长期合同中双方当事人合同履行不能的各类情况以及研究司法调整需要法院审慎行使职权的结论。Faced with the driving force of the domestic and international economic cycle,the importance of long-term contracts in commercial transactions has become increasingly apparent.However,China's current legal norms still adjust the legal relationship related to long-term contracts using the norms of ordinary contract legal relationships.Applying ordinary contract norms to adjust long-term contracts obviously overlooks the special status of long-term contracts compared to ordinary contracts.It neither accurately grasps the purpose of the contract nor maintains the fairness and justice of the contract.During the performance of long-term contracts,there may be situations of obvious unfairness,such as hold-up,caused by one party's difficulty in extricating itself.Therefore,this paper explores the theoretical status and judicial adjustment of long-term contracts,summarizes various situations where the parties to a long-term contract cannot perform the contract,and concludes that judicial adjustment requires courts to exercise their powers prudently.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7