社区居民参与的本土理论构建与实践发展动向  

Indigenous Theoretical Frameworks and Practical Development Trends of Community Resident Participation

作　　者：俞祖成 彭扬 Yu Zucheng;Peng Yang

机构地区：[1]上海外国语大学,上海200083

出　　处：《上海行政学院学报》2024年第4期26-38,共13页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助项目“中国式基层治理现代化的理论与实践”(2023TD001)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：就城市治理场域而言,不管是“群众广泛参与”,还是“共建共治”,抑或“人人有责、人人尽责”等政策要求,都深刻揭示出社区居民参与的极端重要性。社区居民参与是一个动态的、历史的、实践的社会概念,应当置于具体的社会背景和制度前提下加以讨论。就当下我国的现实国情而言,社区居民参与应遵循居民自治的理念,坚持居民权利与义务相对等的原则,通过一定的组织或渠道推动居民参与社区活动或社区事务的决策、管理和运作。截至目前,国内学界构建出“本土居民参与阶梯理论”“群众参与理论”“社区行动者理论”以及“居民社区责任理论”等本土理论,从近年来的实践发展动向来看,不少探索有力回应了其中的若干理论,但也有不少探索突破了已有理论的检视范畴。未来,进一步推动社区居民参与并打造城市治理共同体,应从物质基础、价值动力和实践场域三个维度加以展开。Within the realm of urban governance,the policy imperatives such as“extensive mass participation”,“common construction,common governing”,and“everyone has responsibilities and everyone fulfills their responsibilities”underscore the pivotal role of resident involvement in communities.Resident participation in community is a dynamic,historical,and practical social concept that should be discussed in the context of specific social backgrounds and systems.In the current socio-political landscape of our country,it is imperative to uphold the principle of residents’self-governance,maintain the equitable balance of residents'rights and obligations,and facilitate community residents'involvement in decision-making,management,and operational aspects of community affairs through established organizational structures or channels.Within academic discourse,various local theories have emerged,including the“Chinese ladder model of resident participation,”“mass participation theory,”“community actors theory,”and“residents’community responsibility theory.”Nevertheless,recent developmental trends indicate that numerous experimental initiatives are either reinforcing or transcending these theoretical frameworks.Future endeavors on advancing community residents’participation and fostering genuine urban governance communities should be carried out from three dimensions:material infrastructure,value-driven impetus,and practical domains.

关 键 词：社区居民参与 居民自治 理论本土化 实践发展 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学]