大数据时代跨境电子取证的治理困境与应对  

The Governance Dilemma and Countermeasures of Cross-Border Electronic Forensics in the Era of Big Data

作　　者：元轶[1,2] 纪钊洋 YUAN Yi;JI Zhaoyang

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学 [2]中国政法大学比较法学研究院中俄法学研究所 [3]中国政法大学企业刑事风险防范研究中心

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2024年第4期180-191,共12页Journal Of CUPL

摘　　要：跨境犯罪屡见不鲜,进行跨境电子数据取证是打击跨境犯罪的重要途径。本文通过案例分析发现国际刑事司法协助、单边跨境取证与网络服务提供者协助三种方式在实践中的优劣势,并列举美、欧、俄三国不同的跨境取证模式,发现对我国有借鉴意义的内容,提出解决我国跨境取证存在的问题的方式,有助于丰富我国跨境电子数据取证方式,更好地应对跨境网络犯罪相关问题。Cross-border crimes are common,and cross-border electronic data forensics is an important way to combat cross-border crimes.Through case analysis,the paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods of international criminal judicial assistance,unilateral cross-border forensics and network service providers in practice.By listing different cross-border forensics models of the United States,Europe and Russia,the paper identifies the aspects of reference significance for China and proposes solutions to existing problems in China’s crossborder forensics,thereby enriching China’s cross-border electronic data forensics methods and helping better deal with issues related to cross-border cybercrime.

关 键 词：跨境取证 电子数据 国际刑事司法协助 单边取证 网络服务提供者 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]