双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的对比研究  

A comparative study of double-loop versus Y-shaped triple-loop TightRope button plate internal fixation for treatment of Rockwood typeⅢ-Ⅴfresh acromioclavicular joint dislocation

作　　者：沈哲源 彭巧英[1] 李恒[1] 郭松华 张占丰[1] SHEN Zheyuan;PENG Qiaoying;LI Heng;GUO Songhua;ZHANG Zhanfeng(The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou,Huzhou 313000,Zhejiang,China)

机构地区：[1]湖州市第一人民医院,浙江湖州313000

出　　处：《中医正骨》2024年第7期22-27,54,共7页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology

基　　金：浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2024KY1649)。

摘　　要：目的:比较双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年5月收治的74例肩锁关节脱位患者的病例资料,其中采用双袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗者43例(双袢组),采用“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗者31例(三袢组)。比较2组患者的手术时间、喙锁间距差值、肩部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节量表评分、Constant-Murley肩关节评分及并发症发生率。结果:双袢组的手术时间短于三袢组[(31.37±4.03)min,(50.94±5.66)min,t=17.387,P=0.000)]。术后6周、24周、1年以及末次随访时,双袢组的喙锁间距差值均高于三袢组[(1.60±1.76)mm,(0.26±0.23)mm,t=4.220,P=0.000;(2.11±2.11)mm,(0.31±0.31)mm,t=4.695,P=0.000;(2.19±2.19)mm,(0.38±0.37)mm,t=4.536,P=0.000;(2.21±2.21)mm,(0.40±0.39)mm,t=4.499,P=0.000]。末次随访时,2组患者的肩部疼痛VAS评分均较术前降低(t=32.538,P=0.000;t=24.849,P=0.000),2组患者的肩部疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义[(0.56±0.70)分,(0.55±0.72)分,t=0.058,P=0.954]。末次随访时,2组患者的UCLA肩关节量表评分均较术前增高(t=-108.72,P=0.000;t=-52.267,P=0.000),双袢组的UCLA肩关节量表评分低于三袢组[(47.02±1.71)分,(49.32±2.77)分,t=-2.490,P=0.015]。末次随访时,2组患者的Constant-Murley肩关节评分均较术前增高(t=-63.617,P=0.000;t=-67.607,P=0.000),双袢组的Constant-Murley肩关节评分低于三袢组[(94.58±2.70)分,(94.61±3.12)分,t=-2.135,P=0.036]。双袢组2例发生锁骨骨溶解,三袢组1例发生切口感染。2组患者并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。结论:双袢与“Y”形三袢TightRope纽扣钢板内固定治疗新鲜RockwoodⅢ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位,均能减轻肩关节疼痛,但双袢固定的手术时间更短、“Y”形Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes and safety of double-loop versus Y-shaped triple-loop TightRope button plate internal fixation in treatment of Rockwood typeⅢ-Ⅴfresh acromioclavicular joint dislocation(ACJD).Methods:The medical records of 74 ACJD patients recruited from January 2016 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.Forty-three patients were treated with double-loop TightRope button plate internal fixation(double-loop group),and 31 ones with Y-shaped triple-loop TightRope button plate internal fixation(triple-loop group).The operative time,coracoclavicular distance(CCD)difference,shoulder pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score,University of California Los Angeles(UCLA)shoulder score,Constant-Murley shoulder score,and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.Results:The operative time was shorter in double-loop group compared to triple-loop group(31.37±4.03 vs 50.94±5.66 minutes,t=17.387,P=0.000).The difference of CCD was larger in double-loop group compared to triple-loop group at postoperative week 6,week 24,month 12 and the last follow-up(1.60±1.76 vs 0.26±0.23 mm,t=4.220,P=0.000;2.11±2.11 vs 0.31±0.31 mm,t=4.695,P=0.000;2.19±2.19 vs 0.38±0.37 mm,t=4.536,P=0.000;2.21±2.21 vs 0.40±0.39 mm,t=4.499,P=0.000).The shoulder pain VAS score decreased in the 2 groups at the last follow-up compared to pre-operation(t=32.538,P=0.000;t=24.849,P=0.000),and the difference was not statistically significant between the 2 groups(0.56±0.70 vs 0.55±0.72 points,t=0.058,P=0.954).The UCLA shoulder score increased in the 2 groups at the last follow-up compared to pre-operation(t=-108.72,P=0.000;t=-52.267,P=0.000),and it was lower in double-loop group compared to triple-loop group(47.02±1.71 vs 49.32±2.77 points,t=-2.490,P=0.015).The Constant-Murley shoulder score increased in the 2 groups at the last follow-up compared to pre-operation(t=-63.617,P=0.000;t=-67.607,P=0.000),and it was lower in double-loop group compared to triple-loop group(94.58±2.70 vs 94.61±3.12 points,t=-2.13

关 键 词：肩锁关节 肩脱位 TightRope纽扣钢板 喙锁韧带重建 临床试验 

分 类 号：R687.4[医药卫生—骨科学]