长期公派出国留学对三甲医院临床医师综合能力培养的实践效果研究  

Study on the practical effect of long-term public study abroad on cultivation of comprehensive ability of clinicians in tertiary hospitals

作　　者：赵之玥 ZHAO Zhiyue(Office of the Hospital,Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing100730,China)

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院院办公室,北京100730

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2024年第17期46-49,共4页China Medical Herald

基　　金：北京市属医院科研培育计划项目(PG2019005);首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院青年人才培养计划项目(2019-YJJ-ZZL-055)。

摘　　要：目的 研究长期公派出国留学对医院人才培养的实践效果,为完善医院出国留学培养政策及管理工作提供科学依据。方法 选取2018年1月至2019年12月首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院长期公派留学的36名临床医师为出国组,采用倾向性评分匹配无出国留学经历的36名临床医师为对照组。以出国人员出国年度作为基准,比较两组回国后4年内科学研究、临床能力、教学成果方面的差异。结果 两组发表SCI论文数量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组发表SCI论文的影响因子比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组发表SCI论文的JCR分区比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。出国组主持局级课题基金,开展新技术、新项目占比高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组主持省部级、国家级课题基金,获得专利情况,导师资格比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 长期公派出国留学是提高临床医师科研及临床能力的有效途径。将发表文章质量、获批局级课题基金和开展新技术、新项目情况作为长期公派出国留学回国人员的短期评价指标较为合理。Objective To study the practical effect of long-term public study abroad on cultivation of talents in hospitals,and to provide scientific basis for the improvement of hospital study abroad cultivation policy and management.Methods Thirty-six clinicians with long-term public study abroad from January 2018 to December 2019 at Beijing Tongren Hospital,Capital Medical University were selected as the abroad group,and 36 clinicians with no study abroad experience were matched using propensity scoring as the control group.The year of the expatriates’departure was used as a benchmark,the differences in scientific research,clinical competence,and teaching achievements between the two groups within four years after their return were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the number of SCI papers published between the two groups(P>0.05);there was significant difference in influence factors of SCI papers published between the two groups(P<0.05);and there was significant difference in JCR partition of SCI papers published between the two groups(P<0.05).The percentage hosting bureau-level subject funds and carrying out new technologies and projects of the abroad group were higher than those of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05);and there were no significant differences in the hosting provincial-ministerial and national-level subject funds,obtaining patents,and the qualifications of mentors between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Long-term public study abroad is an effective way to improve clinicians’scientific research and clinical ability.It is more reasonable to take the quality of published articles,the approval of bureau-level projects funds,and carrying out new technologies and projects as short-term evaluation indicators for long-term public study abroad returnees.

关 键 词：出国留学 临床医师 综合能力 人才培养 

分 类 号：R192.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]