检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘森 Liu Sen
机构地区:[1]安徽大学法学院
出 处:《浙江档案》2024年第6期23-26,共4页Zhejiang Archives
摘 要:数字时代的到来掀起档案数据化的浪潮,与此同时,也对档案安全的刑法保障提出了新问题和新要求。考察档案数据安全刑法保护的现状,发现当前刑法保护档案数据安全存在计算机信息系统犯罪罪名难以全面规制档案数据犯罪、档案犯罪罪名被虚置化和行刑衔接不畅等问题。这与档案数据的司法认知偏差、档案犯罪罪名本身的立法缺陷、案件移送流程不畅有关。要完善档案数据安全刑法保护,应回归档案数据的档案本质,以档案犯罪罪名体系规制档案数据犯罪;同时还应完善档案违法犯罪案件移送机制和创建协同治理体系,以实现对档案数据安全的全流程、多方位保护。The arrival of the digital era has set off a wave of archive datatization, and at the same time, it has also raised new problems and requirements for the criminal law protection of archive security. Examining the current situation of criminal law protection of archive data security, it is found that the current criminal law protection of archive data security exists such problems as the difficulty of comprehensively regulating archive data crimes in computer information system crimes, the fictionalization of archive crime crimes, and the poor convergence of execution and punishment. This is related to the judicial cognitive bias of archive data, the legislative defects of the archive crime offense itself, and the poor case transfer process. In order to improve the criminal law protection of archive data security, the nature of archive data should be returned to archive data, and archive data crimes should be regulated by the archive crime system;at the same time, it should also improve the mechanism for the transfer of archive crimes and create a coordinated governance system, so as to realize the full-process and multi-directional protection of archive data security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.134.81.178