检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘燕 孙杰 Yan Liu;Jie Sun(Sichuan Youdu Law Firm,Chengdu Sichuan;Sichuan Huachen Law Firm,Chengdu Sichuan)
机构地区:[1]四川有度律师事务所,四川成都 [2]四川华晨律师事务所,四川成都
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第7期4429-4433,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:近年来刑事冤假错案不断曝光,侦查讯问时犯罪嫌疑人被刑讯逼供、屈打成招是造成冤案屡屡发生的重要原因。由于侦查活动具有秘密封闭性的特点,除了侦察机关和犯罪嫌疑人外,外界很难参与进去,这也为侦察机关的权力滥用提供了方便的空间和条件,同时立法上对犯罪嫌疑人在侦查阶段的程序性权力保障缺失,使得在侦查讯问时犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益难以得到有效保护。律师在场权的确定,能实现司法公正,更大力度保护犯罪嫌疑人的合法权益。In recent years,unjust,false and wrong criminal cases have been exposed continuously.The important reason for the occurrence of unjust cases is that suspects are tortured to extort confessions and forced to confess.Due to the closeness of investigation activities,it is difficult for the outside world to participate in the investigation activities except for the investigation organs and suspect,which also provides convenient space and conditions for the abuse of power of the investigation organs.At the same time,the lack of legislative protection of the procedural power of suspect in the investigation stage makes it difficult to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of suspect during investigation and interrogation.The determination of the right of lawyers to be present can achieve judicial justice and protect the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects more vigorously.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.174.159