检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周瑞 鲁常宝 Rui Zhou;Changbao Lu(College of Law,Polotsk State University,Novopolotsk,Belarus)
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第7期4786-4790,共5页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:在大数据时代,个人信息保护的刑法完善对于保障个人隐私权与尊严、促进技术与法律的和谐发展以及增强公众信任与社会稳定具有重要意义。然而,当前我国个人信息刑法保护存在界定不明确、行为方式界限模糊、罪名及罪数认定困难、刑罚及救济途径不足和知情同意原则适用不力等问题。本研究提出通过明确个人信息的法律定义与范围、完善行为方式与犯罪类型立法规定、规范罪名与罪数认定的司法实践、提升刑罚力度与救济机制有效性以及建立知情同意原则的法律实施框架等路径来完善个人信息的刑法保护。In the era of big data,the perfection of criminal law for personal information protection is of great significance for guaranteeing individual privacy and dignity,promoting the harmonious development of technology and law,and enhancing public trust and social stability.However,at present,there are some problems in the protection of personal information in criminal law,such as unclear definition,vague boundary of behavior mode,difficulty in identifying charges and number of crimes,insufficient ways of punishment and relief,and ineffective application of the principle of informed consent.This study proposes to improve the protection of personal information in criminal law by clarifying the legal definition and scope of personal information,improving the legislative provisions on behavior patterns and crime types,standardizing the judicial practice of identifying charges and number of crimes,enhancing the intensity of punishment and the effectiveness of the relief mechanism,and establishing the legal implementation framework of the principle of informed consent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49