检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨静雯 Jingwen Yang(School of Law,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang Jiangsu)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学法学院,江苏镇江
出 处:《法学(汉斯)》2024年第7期4811-4817,共7页Open Journal of Legal Science
摘 要:为进一步施放个人信息保护民事公益诉讼制度的弥补与威慑功能,损害赔偿请求权伊始广泛用于该制度中,然拘囿于法律供给尚有不足,故理论与实务层面龃龉不合。于此,藉由对司法案例梳理及域外经验探察:法定诉权机关可适用损害赔偿,基于行为功利主义及现实需求亦可提起惩罚性赔偿,对于小额分散性相关案件可针对性适用撇去不法侵害请求权。In order to further exert the compensatory and deterrent function of the personal information protection civil public interest litigation system,the right to claim damages was widely used in the system at the beginning,but the legal supply was still insufficient,so the theory and practice level were inconsistent.In this regard,by combing judicial cases and exploring extraterritorial experience,the statutory litigation authority can apply damages,and punitive damages can be filed based on behavioral utilitarianism and practical needs.For small dispersed related cases,the right to claim for illegal infringement can be targeted.
关 键 词:个人信息保护民事公益诉讼 损害赔偿责任适用 赔偿请求权类型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.188.157