认罪认罚从宽背景下的证据开示制度探究  

Research on the Evidence Discovery System under the Background of Leniency of Guilty Plea and Punishment

作　　者：蒋环羽 Huanyu Jiang(School of Law,Ningbo University,Ningbo Zhejiang)

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波

出　　处：《法学（汉斯）》2024年第7期4823-4836,共14页Open Journal of Legal Science

摘　　要：随着认罪认罚从宽程序的普遍选择,人民检察院在这类案件中的作用往往是决定性的,认罪认罚程序在兼顾效率与公平这一问题上的矛盾日益突出。新时代下,如何完善证据开示制度成为一个亟待解决的现实课题。“两高三部”于2019年发布的《关于适用认罪认罚从宽制度的指导意见》(以下简称《指导意见》)第29条在法律层面赋予了人民检察院对这一制度的探索权。本文对认罪认罚从宽角度下的证据开示制度进行正当性分析,针对当前证据开示主体、范围、时间、救济途径等不明确而造成的问题,提出了明确开示主体、扩大开示范围、明确开示时间、构建制裁与救济机制等完善措施。With the widespread application of the leniency system of guilty plea and punishment,procuratorial organs often occupy a dominant position in such cases.The contradiction between efficiency and fairness in the procedure of guilty plea and punishment has become increasingly prominent.In the new era,how to improve the evidence discovery system has become an urgent practical issue to be solved.Article 29 of the guiding opinions on the application of the leniency system for confession and punishment(hereinafter referred to as the Guiding Opinions)issued by the“two high schools and three departments”in October 2019 gives the people’s procuratorate the right to explore this system at the legal level.This paper analyzes the legitimacy of the evidence discovery system from a broad perspective of guilty plea and punishment,and puts forward some improvement measures,such as clarifying the discovery subject,expanding the discovery scope,clarifying the discovery time,and constructing the sanctions and relief mechanism.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 量刑协商 证据开示 知悉权保障 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]