司法数字公开中个人信息隐私保护的“整体—责任”模式  被引量:2

The"Holistic-Responsibility"Model for Personal Information Privacy Protection in the Digital Open Justice

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:齐延平 田奥妮 QI Yanping;TIAN Aoni

机构地区:[1]北京理工大学工信部智能科技风险法律防控重点实验室 [2]中国政法大学人权研究院

出  处:《中国法律评论》2024年第4期102-113,共12页China Law Review

基  金:2021年度国家社科基金重点项目“自动化行政算法决策的法律控制”(21AFX004);2021年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“互联网平台的社会影响及治理路径研究”(21&ZD195)阶段性成果。

摘  要:司法数字公开中的个人信息隐私面临即时公开与存量公开导致的时间向度风险、虚实同构与关联交叉引发的空间维度风险、数据汇集与链式传播造成的规模效应风险,三重风险叠加势必又会危及个人生活安宁,衍生信息隐私歧视,侵蚀人的尊严价值。传统“个体—自由”隐私权救济模式背离个人信息隐私公共性价值面向,难以应对个人信息隐私面临的动态化与结构性风险冲击以及信息隐私保护责任之偏移错位困境。“整体—责任”的个人信息隐私保护主导模式立足信息隐私之于个人之私与社会共同体之公的价值统一,在场景一致性原则下强调整体层面“前—中”端的风险防控以及主审法官责任的承担。我国应当以“整体—责任”保护模式为主导,以“个体—自由”救济模式为辅助,实现司法数字公开与个人信息隐私保护的价值平衡。The personal information privacy in the digital open justice faces the risk of temporal orientation caused by Instant judicial openness and cumulative judicial openness,the risk of spatial dimension triggered by virtual-real isomorphism and correlation intersect,and the risk of scale effect caused by data aggregation and chain propagation.The combination of these three risks will inevitably jeopardize the peace of mind in personal life,give rise to discrimination on the basis of information privacy and erode the value of human dignity.The traditional"individual-freedom"privacy remedy model deviates from the public value of personal information privacy,and it is difficult to cope with the dynamic and structural risk impact of personal information privacy and the misplaced responsibility for information privacy protection.The"holistic-responsibility"model of personal information privacy protection is based on the unity of the value of information privacy for the private interests of the individual and the public interests of the social community.It emphasizes risk prevention and control at the"front-middle"end of the holistic level and the assumption of responsibility by the presiding judge,under the principle of contextual integrity.Therefore,we should take the"holistic-responsibility"protection model as the leading role and the"individual-freedom"relief model as the supporting role,so as to achieve a balance between the value of digital open justice and the protection of personal information privacy.

关 键 词:司法数字公开 信息隐私保护 “整体—责任”模式 

分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D923[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象