检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:母娜 王征兵[1] MU Na;WANG Zhengbing
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《经济问题探索》2024年第8期1-17,共17页Inquiry Into Economic Issues
基 金:国家社会科学基金“共同富裕视阈下我国新型农村集体经济发展的组构、赋能及模式选择研究”(22BGL024),主持人:刘宇翔;陕西省哲学社会科学基金“数字乡村建设驱动农村集体经济高质量发展的机理与路径研究”(2024ZD496),主持人:王征兵;西北农林科技大学经济管理学院研究生科研创新项目“数字乡村建设、村域社会资本对新型农村集体经济发展的影响”(JGYJSCXXM202401),主持人:母娜。
摘 要:基于中国乡村振兴综合调查(China Rural Revitalization Survey,简称CRRS)数据,对新型农村集体经济发展对村民共同富裕的影响及其作用机制进行了实证分析。研究发现:新型农村集体经济发展可显著提升村民的物质富裕和精神富裕水平。机制分析显示,新型农村集体经济发展通过增加财产性收入、创造非农就业机会来促进村民共同富裕,公共服务仅在新型农村集体经济发展促进村民精神富裕间发挥中介效应,公共参与不是新型农村集体经济发展与共同富裕之间的中介机制。异质性分析表明,不论是否已完成集体产权制度改革,集体经济的发展都能显著促进村民的共同富裕;但在有贫困经历的村庄,集体经济发展仅促进村民物质富裕,对精神富裕的影响不显著。进一步分析发现:新型农村集体经济发展存在着“马太效应”,对西部地区缩小收入差距的贡献不明显。上述研究结果表明,现阶段实现共同富裕的重要举措是推动农村集体经济实现高质量发展。Drawing upon comprehensive data from the 2019 China Rural Revitalization Survey,this study employs econometric models to investigate the impact of the development of the new rural collective economy on the common prosperity of rural residents,as well as the underlying mechanisms at play.The findings of this research are as follows:Firstly,the development of the new rural collective economy ex⁃hibits a significant positive influence on both the material and spiritual prosperity of rural residents.Sec⁃ondly,property income and non-agricultural employment serve as prominent mediators between the new rural collective economy and common prosperity,while public services solely mediate the relationship be⁃tween the development of the new rural collective economy and the enhancement of rural residents’spiritual well-being.Public participation,however,does not emerge as a mediating mechanism between the de⁃velopment of the new rural collective economy and common prosperity.Thirdly,further analysis reveals that regardless of the completion status of reforms pertaining to rural collective property rights,the develop⁃ment of the collective economy significantly promotes common prosperity among rural residents.Nonethe⁃less,in villages with experience poverty,the development of the collective economy primarily affects ma⁃terial prosperity,with a less significant impact on the spiritual well-being of residents.Further analysis reveals that there is a Matthew effect in the development of the new rural collective economy,and that its contribution to narrowing the income gap in the western region is not obvious.The above findings suggest that an important step in realizing common prosperity at this stage is to promote the high-quality develop⁃ment of the rural collective economy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.106.206