检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田炜健 Tian Weijian(Southeast University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211100)
机构地区:[1]东南大学,江苏南京211100
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2024年第3期24-29,共6页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:《消费者权益保护法》未对消费欺诈进行明确界定,导致司法实践认定混乱,基于其独特的立法背景和目的,应当在功能主义视角下分析消费欺诈的认定标准。扩大消费欺诈惩罚范围和增强消费欺诈惩罚力度的双重功能,使消费欺诈区别于民事法律与行政法规中的欺诈,应当适用“两要件说”的认定标准,通过概括加列举的方式,将消费欺诈的认定范围界定清晰。消费欺诈行为的多样性与主观过错的层次性,要求惩罚倍数具有弹性,以达成消费欺诈整体制度的协调统一。Consumer Rights and Interests Protection Law does not clearly define consumer fraud,which leads to confusion in judicial practice.Based on its unique legislative background and purpose,the identification criteria of consumer fraud should be analyzed from the perspective of functionalism.The dual functions of expanding the scope of punishment for consumer fraud and enhancing the intensity of punishment for consumer fraud,so that consumer fraud is different from fraud in civil laws and administrative regulations,the identification standard of"two elements"should be applied,and the identification scope of consumer fraud should be clearly defined by summarizing and enumerating.The diversity of consumer fraud and the level of subjective fault require the flexibility of penalty multiple to achieve the coordination and unity of the whole system of consumer fraud.
关 键 词:《消费者权益保护法》 功能主义 消费欺诈 惩罚性赔偿
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49