中古时期文学“评价坐标”嬗变与王粲文学地位的重估  

Change of “Literary Coordinates” and Revaluation of Wang Can’s Literary Status in the Middle Ages

作　　者：陈丽平 李巍巍 CHEN Liping;LI Weiwei(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Liaoning University,Shenyang 110000,China;Library of Anshan Normal University,Anshan 114000,China)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学文学院,辽宁沈阳110000 [2]鞍山师范学院图书馆,辽宁鞍山114000

出　　处：《湖南人文科技学院学报》2024年第4期62-66,共5页Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology

基　　金：辽宁省社科基金项目“《文选》与先唐文学的经典化”(L20AZW003)。

摘　　要：魏晋至南朝时期,文人对王粲的评价重心及其文学地位的认识发生了明显转变,反映了该时期文学“评价坐标”的嬗变。曹丕对王粲的文学品评重心在辞赋,这个时期王粲的文学地位在建安文人中并不突出;刘宋以后作家评论转向以诗歌为中心,兴起了对王粲诗歌特点及其文学地位的讨论,引发关于王粲、刘桢文学地位高低的争议;之后,萧统《文选》和刘勰《文心雕龙》对作家的才能及其擅长文体类型进行了颇为全面的考察,在对历代作家的别集、总集类文献的纵向、横向比较后,王粲“七子之冠冕”的称号最终确立。During the period of Wei,Jin,and Southern Dynasties,there was a significant shift in the evaluation focus and liter-ary status of Wang Can among literati,reflecting the evolution of the literary“evaluation coordinates”during that period.Cao Pi’s literary evaluation of Wang Can focused on poetry and prose,and during this period,Wang Can’s literary status was not prominent among Jian’an literati.After the Liu Song Dynasty,comments on writers shifted towards poetry as the center,sparking discussions on the characteristics of Wang Can's poetry and its literary status,which aroused controversy over the literary status of Wang Can and Liu Zhen.Afterwards,Xiao Tong’s Selected Works and Liu Xie’s The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons conducted a com-prehensive examination of the talents and literary genres of the writers.After comparing the various collections of literature from dif-ferent dynasties,Wang Can’s title of“top of seven leading writers during the Jian’an Period”was finally established.

关 键 词：王粲批评 萧统《文选》 评价坐标 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]