住房保障、消费差异与流动人口主观幸福感  

Housing Insurance,Consumption Differences,and Floating Population’s Subjective Well-being

作　　者：李俊 刘颖[1,2,3] 成前[1,2,3] Li Jun;Liu Ying;Cheng Qian

机构地区：[1]信阳师范大学商学院,河南信阳464000 [2]北京理工大学人文学院,北京100081 [3]南开大学经济学院,天津300071

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期6-12,152,共8页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“高素质人才流动特征及其影响因素研究”(63232102)阶段性成果;河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目(YJS2022JD30)阶段性成果;信阳师范学院“南湖学者奖励计划”青年项目阶段性成果。

摘　　要：结合2014年和2018年流动人口动态监测数据,实证分析住房保障、消费差异与流动人口的主观幸福感之间的关系,研究结果显示:消费差异对流动人口的主观幸福感产生负面影响,而住房保障措施则有助于提升流动人口的主观幸福感;消费差异、住房保障和流动人口的主观幸福感三者之间存在调节机制,即消费差异削弱了住房保障对提升流动人口主观幸福感的积极作用。进一步的机制分析表明,消费差异通过影响社会地位感知、个人情绪和健康,对流动人口的主观幸福感产生负面作用;与此同时,住房保障通过改善居住环境、促进社会融合以及收入效应提高了流动人口的主观幸福感。Based on the data from the 2014and 2018floating population dynamic monitoring surveys,an empirical analysis was conducted to explore the relationship between housing security,consumption disparities,and the subjective well-being of the floating population.The study’s results show that consumption disparities have a negative impact on the subjective well-being of the floating population,while housing security measures help to improve it.There is a regulatory mechanism among consumption disparities,housing security,and the subjective well-being of the floating population,where consumption disparities diminish the positive effects of housing security on enhancing the subjective well-being of the floating population.Further mechanism analysis indicates that consumption disparities negatively affect the subjective well-being of the floating population by influencing social status perception,individual emotions,and health.In the meantime,housing security raises the subjective well-being of the floating population by improving the living environment,promoting social integration,and increasing income effects.

关 键 词：消费差异 流动人口 主观幸福感 

分 类 号：F061.4[经济管理—政治经济学]