检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:康铭 KANG Ming(School of Law,Wenzhou University,Wenzhou 325035,China)
出 处:《遵义师范学院学报》2024年第4期52-55,65,共5页Journal of Zunyi Normal University
摘 要:关于环境质量标准能否作为排污者主张合规抗辩的依据,要立足于我国现实的立法基础、司法实践、不同类型污染的内在特征和规律。在拟制型污染侵权中,环境质量标准不能作为排污者主张合规性抗辩的依据。在实质型污染侵权中,排污者可以排污行为符合环境质量标准而从因果关系方面否认侵权责任的构成,环境质量标准作为排污者不承担侵权责任的理由主要体现在实质型污染侵权中。Whether environmental quality standards can serve as a basis for polluters to argue for compliance should be based on current legislative foundation,judicial practice,and the inherent characteristics and laws of different types of pollution in China.In simulated pollution infringement,environmental quality standards cannot serve as a basis for polluters to assert compliance defenses.In substantive pollution infringement,polluters can deny the composition of infringement liability froma causal perspective while their pollution behavior meets environmental quality standards.Environmental quality standards,as a reason for polluters not to bear infringement liability,are mainly reflected in substantive pollution infringement.
分 类 号:DF468[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7