理论与实践:醉酒驾驶出罪问题探析  

Theory and Practice:Analysis of the Crime of Drunk Driving

作　　者：孙飘扬 SUN Piao-yang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第7期56-60,共5页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(八)》将醉酒驾驶行为纳入危险驾驶罪的规制对象,实现了对公共安全这一法益更为有利的保护。但醉驾行为是否一律入罪引发了理论界和实务界的争议。理论上,区分入罪论为目前主流观点,主张对部分醉驾行为进行出罪是基于对刑法“但书”条款的考虑和限定抽象危险犯的解释。在司法实践中,醉驾的出罪路径依赖于对“但书”条款下“情节显著轻微”和违法阻却事由的适用,但不予定罪处罚的案例较少。“The Eighth Amendment to the Criminal Law”includes drunk driving behavior as a regulated object of the crime of dangerous driving,achieving a more favorable protection of public safety as a legal interest.However,whether drunk driving behavior should be uniformly criminalized has sparked controversy in both theoretical and practical circles.In theory,the current mainstream view is to distinguish between criminalization and criminalization,advocating for the criminalization of certain drunk driving behaviors based on considerations of the“but clauses”of criminal law and the interpretation of abstract dangerous offenses.In judicial practice,the path to convicting drunk driving depends on the application of the“significant and minor circumstances”and the reasons for illegal obstruction under the“but”clause,but there are relatively few cases where no conviction or punishment is imposed.

关 键 词：醉酒驾驶 危险驾驶罪 抽象危险犯 出罪 但书 

分 类 号：D914.32[政治法律—刑法学]