检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余娜如[1] 李雅云[2] YU Naru;LI Yayun(Taiyuan Institute of Technology,Taiyuan 030008,China;Department of Politics and Law,Party School of the Central Committee of C.P.C,Beijing 100091,China)
机构地区:[1]太原工业学院思政部,太原030008 [2]中共中央党校(国家行政学院)政治和法律教研部,北京100091
出 处:《陕西行政学院学报》2024年第3期115-119,共5页Journal of Shaanxi Academy of Governance
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“近代中国法治与刑法伦理的变迁研究”(2015CFX008);湖南省财政厅资助项目“湖南省殡葬管理之法律规制探析”(B41952)。
摘 要:殡葬改革对每位公民来说都具有重要意义。不论是出于改革效果的提升还是基本的政治道德考量,殡葬改革都需要向公民解释其正当性,以赢得公民内心的认同。从法律家长主义的角度出发,对普惠制殡葬改革的正当性进行论证后发现,目前公权力在干预殡葬行为时,以节约土地等经济利益为依据说服力不足,法律家长主义对公权力的正当性的论证存在缺陷。应当增强个体的主体性和对公民参与立法过程的重视,以此提升公权力的正当性,促进殡葬法治的良性发展。Funeral reform is of great significance to every citizen.Whether for the improvement of reform effectiveness or basic political and moral considerations,funeral reform needs to explain its legitimacy to citizens in order to win their inner recognition.This article argues for the legitimacy of the reform of the universal funeral system from the perspective of legal paternalism.Research has found that the current public power lacks persuasiveness in intervening in funeral activities based on economic benefits such as land conservation,and there are deficiencies in the legal paternalistic argument for the legitimacy of public power.We should enhance the subjectivity of individuals and attach importance to the participation of citizens in the legislative process,in order to enhance the legitimacy of public power and promote the healthy development of the funeral rule of law.
分 类 号:D922.182[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49