检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李光宇 LI Guangyu(Faculty of Law,The University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 999077,China)
出 处:《山东科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期35-46,共12页Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:设置深层链接是否构成信息网络传播权直接侵权尚无定论。对信息网络传播行为的判定,国内形成服务器标准和非服务器标准对立之局面,而欧盟法下的新公众标准有截然不同的判定逻辑。基于140个中国法院案例的实证研究揭示:被链作品不侵权的案例中,是否产生“新公众”对于裁判结果有显著影响;被链作品侵权的案件中,裁判理念仍与新公众标准的判定逻辑相符。中国司法实践整体呈现出的裁判规律与新公众标准的隐性契合彰显司法智慧。深层链接是否使得作品向著作权人首次传播所预计的公众范围之外的“新公众”传播应当是判定直接侵权的依据。The issue of whether creating deep links constitutes a direct infringement on the right of communication of works via information networks is still unsolved.The server test and tests opposite to it are proposed by the existing literature.Comparatively,the EU seems to adopt a test based on a fundamentally different logic.However,an empirical study based on 140 cases held by Chinese courts reveals that:As for those linked-to works that do not infringe copyright,the emergence of a new public has a significant impact on decision outcome regarding direct infringement;as for those non-infringing linked-to works,the guiding principle still complies with the logic of the new public test.The implicit consistency with the EU new public test as presented by the Chinese judiciary authorities indicates judicial wisdom and rationality.Therefore,the new public test should serve as the standard for determining an infringement arising from the creation of deep links.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.198.162