检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵莹 阳仁彤 杨鹏 ZHAO Ying;YANG Ren-tong;YANG Peng(Chongqing Academy of Metrology and Quality Inspection)
机构地区:[1]重庆市计量质量检测研究院
出 处:《标准科学》2024年第8期50-56,共7页Standard Science
基 金:重庆市市场监督管理局科技项目“产品缺陷认定评价标准指标体系研究”(项目编号:CQSJKJ2022044)资助。
摘 要:虽然我国已经形成了以《民法典》《消费者权益保护法》为基本法,涵盖行政法规《缺陷汽车产品召回管理条例》及部门规章《消费品召回管理暂行规定》等法律文件的产品召回制度,但在产品召回实施过程中发现我国召回制度还存在一些悬而未决的问题。本文意在梳理我国缺陷产品召回制度中的冲突与缺位,提出相应建议,拟推进产品召回制度体系不断完善。Although China has established a product recall system with the Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Law as the basic laws,which include legal documents such as the Regulations on Defective Auto Product Recall Management and the Interim Provisions on the Administration of Recall of Consumer Goods,some issues that were identified in the implementation process of product recalls have not been solved yet.This paper analyzes the conflicts and shortcomings in China’s defective product recall system,and proposes corresponding suggestions to promote the continuous improvement of the product recall system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49