检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴建明 张昌 WU Jianming;ZHANG Chang(Shenwan Infrastructure(Shenzhen)Co.,Ltd.,Shenzhen 518000,Guangdong,China;CCCC First Highway Consultants Co.,Ltd.,Xi'an 710068,Shaanxi,China)
机构地区:[1]深湾基建(深圳)有限公司,广东深圳518000 [2]中交第一公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,陕西西安710068
出 处:《工程技术研究》2024年第12期109-111,共3页Engineering and Technological Research
摘 要:文章以深圳外环高速一座(47+47)m斜交连续箱型钢混组合梁为工程背景,采用Midas Civil有限元软件分别建立单梁模型和梁格模型,对比分析了结构支反力、变形及纵横向应力变化情况,给出了两种模型的受力特性差异,得出单梁法不能准确反映横向各纵梁之间差异的结论。同时分析构造设计对主梁受力的变化的影响,结论可作为同类型桥梁设计的指导。Based on the engineering background of a(47+47)m skew continuous box-shaped steel-concrete composite beam in Shenzhen Outer Ring Expressway,the single beam model and grillage model are established by Midas Civil finite element software.The changes of structural support reaction force,deformation and longitudinal and transverse stress are compared and analyzed,and the difference in mechanical characteristics between the two models is given.It is concluded that the single beam method can not accurately reflect the difference among the longitudinal beams in the transverse direction.At the same time,the influence of structural design on the change in force on the main beam is analyzed.The conclusion can be used as guidance for the design of the same type of bridges.
分 类 号:U445[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.236.97