检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张骞[1] 闫云峰[1] 罗太阳[1] 宋光远 ZHANG Qian;YAN Yunfeng;LUO Taiyang;SONG Guangyuan(Department of Cardiology,Beijing Anzhen Hospital,Capital Medical University,National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases,Beijing 100029,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院-北京市心肺血管疾病研究所、国家心血管疾病临床医学研究中心、心内科,100029
出 处:《心肺血管病杂志》2024年第7期680-687,共8页Journal of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases
摘 要:目的:探讨PCI治疗能否改善合并糖尿病的冠状动脉慢性闭塞病变(chronic coronary total occlusion,CTO)患者的临床预后。方法:回顾性选取1044例合并1支CTO病变的糖尿病患者,根据PCI是否成功分为成功CTO-PCI组(CTO-S-PCI组)和失败CTO-PCI组(CTO-F-PCI组),观察两组患者随访12个月主要心血管不良事件(major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE)复合终点,包括心源性死亡、靶血管非计划性血运重建(target vessel revascularization,TVR)和非致死性心肌梗死,以及次要终点全因死亡和非计划性血运重建。中位随访时间为43(24,80)个月。结果:本研究共纳入1044例患者,其中CTO-S-PCI组683例(65.4%),CTO-F-PCI组361例(34.6%)。在主要终点MACE:CTO-S-PCI优于CTO-F-PCI[未校正HR:1.422,95%CI:1.100~1.838;校正HR(模型1):1.332,95%CI:1.004~1.767;校正HR(模型2):1.321,95%CI:0.993~1.759];该优势在心源性死亡、TVR方面的趋势是一致的,但非致死性心肌梗死方面两组间无差别。次要终点方面CTO-S-PCI组全因死亡较CTO-F-PCI组显著减低[未校正HR:1.741,95%CI:1.111~2.729;校正HR(模型1):1.674,95%CI:0.969~2.891;校正HR(模型2):1.633,95%CI:0.941~2.838],但非计划性血运重建方面两组间无差别。结论:PCI治疗能够降低CTO合并糖尿病患者心源性死亡、TVR及全因死亡的风险,使糖尿病的CTO患者从PCI治疗策略中获益。Objective:To explore whether patients withchronic coronary total occlusion(CTO)and diabetes could benefit from PCI.Methods:This was a single center,retrospective,cohort study.A total of 1044 consecutive CTO patients with diabetes who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography were enrolled.According to whether PCI was successful,the enrolled patients were divided into successful CTO-PCI group and failed CTO-PCI group.Major adverse cardiovascular events,including cardiac death,target vessel revascularization,nonfatal infarction,and secondary end point,including all-cause mortality and revascularization,were assessed during 12 months follow-up.The median follow-up was 43 months(24-80 months).Results:Of the 1044 patients who were enrolled in the study,683 were assigned to the successful CTO-PCI group and 361 to the failed CTO-PCI group.The rate of MACE was 20.8%in the successful CTO-PCI group as compared with 27.4%in the failed CTO-PCI group[unadjusted hazard ratio HR=1.422,95%CI:1.100-1.838;adjusted HR(model 1)1.332;95%CI:1.004-1.767;adjusted HR(model 2)1.321,95%CI:0.993-1.759],which b enefited from cardiac death and target vessel revascularization.The rate of all-cause mortality was also lower in the successful CTO-PCI group[unadjusted HR=.741,95%CI:1.111-2.729;adjusted HR(model 1)1.674,95%CI:0.969-2.891;adjusted HR(model 2)1.633,95%CI:0.941-2.838].The rate of nonfatal infarction and revascularization was not significant between the two groups.Conclusions:Among patients with CTO and diabetes,successful PCI resulted in a lower rate of cardiac death,target vessel revascularization and all-cause mortality within 12 months follow-up than failed PCI.
关 键 词:经皮冠状动脉介入 冠状动脉慢性闭塞病变 糖尿病
分 类 号:R54[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.203.214