检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:时明涛 SHI Mingtao(School of Law,Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University,Nanchang 330038,China)
机构地区:[1]江西科技师范大学法学院,江西南昌330038
出 处:《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第4期81-89,共9页Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“数字社会的法律治理体系与立法变革研究”(20&ZD178)。
摘 要:数据应如何保护已经成为我国数字经济发展中的前置性难题。现有理论中,行为规制说与分类保护说均有其制度缺陷,难以满足数据利用与保护的双重需求。既有的数据财产权理论及其批评意见,要么忽略了数据财产权构造上的多种可能性,要么不同程度地存在对数据排他性、共享性和流通性的误解,难以符合我国数字经济的发展战略。数据财产权的构建应以数据权益归属的清晰划分为前提,以数据类型和客观风险为依据,以层次化的规则设计为主要手段,构建权属清晰的数据权利体系。Data security has become a key issue in the development of digital economy in China.In the existing theories,both the behavior regulation theory and the classified protection theory have their institutional defects,which make it difficult to meet the dual needs of data utilization and data protection.The existing data property rights theories and their criticisms either ignore various possibilities in the structure of data property rights,or misunderstand the exclusiveness,the sharing nature and the circulation potential of data to varying degrees,which poses challenges for complying with the development strategy of China’s digital economy.The construction of data property rights should be premised on the clear division of data rights and interests,determined by data types and objective risks,and be mainly designed according to the hierarchical rules in order to build a data rights system with clear ownership.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.136.226