从普遍到特殊的近代日本皇权叙事  

Narrative of Imperial Power in Modern Japan from General to Special

作　　者：张博[1] ZHANG Bo

机构地区：[1]河南大学外语学院,开封475001

出　　处：《北华大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期29-37,151,共10页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部高校国别和区域研究备案中心四川师范大学日韩研究院项目“和平学视阈中的现代冲绳文学研究”(2022RHYB002)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：近代日本皇权叙事建构了近代日本人对天皇权能及其运作方式的认知,是日本政府决策的心理基础。考察近代日本皇权叙事说服机制的运作,可知其形成之始即存在顺应西方“文明标准”与模仿中华圣王政治的双重文化性说服模式。两种模式分别使用西方与中国的具有普遍性意义的伦理来论证近代天皇制政权的正当性,从而构成一个整体性叙事。但在一战后新历史语境下,两种模式均不能说服民众继续支持日本的侵略战争,于是近代日本皇权叙事转为“八纮一宇”模式,即以“日本固有”特殊性伦理将侵略战争粉饰为“圣战”。而日本政府从“对美英协调主义”到“亚洲门罗主义”的政策转换亦基于上述从普遍转向特殊的皇权认知。The modern Japanese imperial power narrative constructs the modern Japanese people’s cognition on the emperor’s power and its operation mode,which is the psychological basis of the Japanese government’s decision-making.By examining the operation of the narrative persuasion mechanism of the imperial power in modern Japan,we can see that from the beginning of the formation of the narrative mode of the imperial power in modern Japan,there existed a bicultural persuasion mode conforming to the“Standard of Civilisation”of the West and imitating the politics of the holy Kings in China.However,in the new historical context after the First World War,neither model can convince the public to continue to support Japan’s war of aggression.Therefore,the narrative of Japanese imperial power in modern times changed to the mode,which is to whitewash the war of aggression with the special ethic of“Japan’s inherent”.Japanese government’s policy shift from“coordination doctrine toward the United States and Britain”to“Monroe Doctrine in Asia”was also based on the above-mentioned cognition from universal to special.

关 键 词：近代日本 天皇制 皇权叙事 文明标准 华夷秩序 叙事模式 

分 类 号：K313[历史地理—历史学]