检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋太珂 Jiang Taike
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学 [2]上海铁路运输检察院
出 处:《青少年犯罪问题》2024年第4期66-78,共13页Issues on Juvenile Crimes and Delinquency
基 金:2021年国家社科基金青年项目“因果力比较的归责构造及其运用研究”(项目编号:21CFX037)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:危险现实化理论肇端自相当因果关系理论的危机。以预见可能性判断为核心的传统相当因果关系理论,不能妥当评价行为后因果流程,是造成相当因果关系理论的危机之本质原因。为妥当评价行为后的因果流程,结果归责评价的重点应由危险创设转向危险实现。对于危险实现的判断,应当实现由形式判断向实质判断的转向。危险现实化理论,在因果力大小的比较标准、因果力较小的行为的评价等问题上,仍然存在完善的必要性。The theory of risk realization originated from the crisis of the relative causality theory.The traditional relative causality theory,which takes the judgment of foreseeable possibility as the core,cannot properly evaluate the causal process after behavior,which is the essential reason for the crisis of relative causality theory.In order to properly evaluate the causal process after behavior,the focus of the evaluation of result attribution should be shifted from the creation of risk to the realization of risk.For the judgment of risk realization,the judgment should be shifted from formal judgment to substantive judgment.The theory of risk realization still has the necessity of improvement in the comparison standard of causal force and the evaluation of behavior with small causal force.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.210.36