检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵一鸣 YIMING ZHAO(School of Law and Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法与经济学院
出 处:《工信财经科技》2024年第4期159-172,共14页Review of Financial & Technological Economics
摘 要:停留于机构监管范式的《中华人民共和国金融稳定法(草案)》难以防范与消解Fintech风险,缺乏对Fintech公司建立有效的行为规制,存在严重的路径依赖问题。本文认为,以演化博弈理论为视角,基于包含监管机构、金融机构和Fintech公司的三方博弈模型,系统治理Fintech风险尚需以下配套措施:坚持系统观念,将Fintech公司纳入《中华人民共和国金融稳定法(草案)》监管对象范围;夯实技术基础,警惕“监管俘获”风险;调整问责形式,优化履职合规免责条款;抓住主要矛盾,聚焦系统重要性金融机构。The Financial Stability Law,which is stuck in the institutional regulatory paradigm,is struggling to prevent and mitigate Fintech risks,and lacks of effective behavioral regulation on Fintech firms,with serious path-dependency issues.From the perspective of evolutionary game theory and based on a model that includes regulators,financial institutions and Fintech companies,the following supporting measures are needed to systematically manage Fintech risks.Insisting on a systemic view to bring Fintech firms within the scope of regulation;strengthening the technological base and alerting to the risk of ‘regulatory capture';adjusting forms of accountability and optimizing exemption clauses;seize the main contradictions and focus on systemically important financial institutions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40