检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石荣 刘昌 唐慧琳[3] 郝俊懿 沈汪兵[4] SHI Rong;LIU Chang;TANG Huilin;HAO Junyi;SHEN Wangbin(Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,China;School of Psychology,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210097,China;School of Teacher Education,Nanjing Xiaozhuang University,Nanjing 210097,China;School of Public Administration,Hohai University,Nanjing 210097,China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学基础医学院医学心理学与伦理学系,济南250012 [2]南京师范大学心理学院,南京210097 [3]南京晓庄学院教师教育学院,南京210097 [4]河海大学公共管理学院,南京210097
出 处:《心理学报》2024年第9期1239-1251,共13页Acta Psychologica Sinica
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年项目(22YJC190018);山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2022QC021);中国博士后基金(2022M711914)资助。
摘 要:亲社会行为作为亲社会属性的重要方面,一直是自然和社会科学研究的焦点。然而,对于人们是否能够形成亲社会行为的一般直觉倾向,仍存在争论。研究聚焦于慈善情境下的捐助行为,采用事件相关电位技术考察加工模式和情境紧急性对捐助行为的影响及其神经机制。行为结果发现,捐助行为受紧急性和捐助成本的双重影响,随着成本的增加,个体更愿意帮助紧急情境下的求助者。脑电结果发现,直觉加工比反思加工诱发了更大的前部N1波幅,而反思加工比直觉加工诱发了更大的P2波幅。在非紧急情境下,反思加工比直觉加工诱发了更大的P3波幅。这一结果表明加工模式不仅影响了个体的早期注意和对刺激的评估,还调节了晚期阶段对非紧急事件的认知投入。研究揭示了加工模式和事件紧急性对亲社会行为的影响,通过关注紧急性这一潜在调节因素为不一致结果指出了方向,扩展了对社会启发式假说的理解。Prosocial behavior is suggested to be a central feature of human life and there is an ongoing debate regarding whether individuals have,therefore,developed a general intuitive tendency to act prosocially or not.Although previous studies have found various indicators of intuitive prosociality from different perspectives,evidence on the potential causal relationship between processing mods and prosocial behavior is mixed.The social heuristics hypothesis(SHH),as a theoretical framework to address this conflicting issue,suggests that associations between processing mode and prosocial behavior are complex and multifaceted,influenced by individual variability and the contexts in which it occurs.A previous study has revealed that intuitive prosocial behavior is more likely to emerge in a perceived emergency that require immediate response.We expected that processing mode(intuition vs.deliberation)will impact people’s decision-making in different helping situations.The study focused on charitable giving.Using event-related potentials(ERPs),we examined the neural mechanisms underlying the effects of processing mode and emergency on helping behaviors.We explored whether a neural signature that rapidly encodes the motivational salience of an event,the P3,can be regulated by processing mode×situation interaction or not.Participants were required to allocate varying amounts of money between themselves and charities they initially labelled as emergency or non-emergency situation that promoted intuitive or deliberative decision making.Each participant received 70 CNY.An instruction on the screen explained that the task required participants to“Accept”or“Reject”donation offers affecting their 70 CNY.To manipulate processing mode,each participant completed fast donation sessions where they were instructed to make decisions as fast as possible,and slow donation sessions where they were instructed to stop and reflect for at least 5 seconds before deciding.EEG signals were recorded during decision making.The behavioral re
关 键 词:加工模式 亲社会行为 紧急性 社会启发式假说 事件相关电位
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C91[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.132.49