IPEF与RCEP:差异、影响及相关思考  

IPEF and RCEP:Differences,Impacts and Considerations

作　　者：卢光盛[1] 赵皓童 LU Guangsheng;ZHAO Haotong

机构地区：[1]云南大学国际关系研究院·区域国别研究院,昆明650091 [2]云南大学周边外交研究中心,昆明650091

出　　处：《亚太经济》2024年第4期10-17,共8页Asia-Pacific Economic Review

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“大变局加速演进背景下中国与东盟共建命运共同体研究”(23&ZD332);云南大学推荐免试研究生科研创新基金资助项目“印太经济框架对华影响研究”(TM-23236990)。

摘　　要：“印太经济框架”(IPEF)是拜登政府“印太战略”下的经济支柱。在《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)全面生效的背景下,IPEF的出现将对亚太地区经贸格局产生巨大影响。IPEF与RCEP同为大型区域性经贸协定,二者在成员国、经济体量、运行机制、规则内容与战略意图上存在差异。美国推行IPEF对RCEP的潜在影响主要围绕在数字经贸规则、地区供应链体系以及亚太地区经济发展格局等方面。对此,RCEP成员国应加快布局,通过强化区域合作关系、进一步深化RCEP合作、完善相关领域规则,在弥合来自IPEF冲击的同时不断挖掘亚太地区经贸发展提升路径,以合作推动区域经济一体化发展更进一步。The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework(IPEF) is the economic pillar under the Biden Administration's Indo-Pacific strategy. In the context of the full implementation of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP), the emergence of IPEF will have a significant impact on the economic and trade landscape in the Asia-Pacific region. Both IPEF and RCEP are large-scale regional economic and trade agreements, with differences in member countries, economic scale, operating mechanisms, rule content and strategic intentions. The potential impact of the U.S. promoting IPEF on RCEP mainly revolves around digital economic and trade rules, regional supply chain systems and the economic development pattern in the Asia-Pacific region. In response to this, RCEP member countries should accelerate their layout, strengthen regional cooperation relationships, further deepen RCEP cooperation and improve rules in related fields. While mitigating the impact from IPEF, they should continuously explore the path of economic and trade development in the Asia-Pacific region and further promote regional economic integration through cooperation.

关 键 词：IPEF RCEP 差异 影响 区域经济一体化 

分 类 号：F742[经济管理—国际贸易]