民国县政权力的结构变化与内部权斗——以1946年湖北省应山县陈汉雄案为中心  

Structural changes and internal vortex of county political power in the Republic of China——Centered on the case of Chen Hanxiong in Yingshan County,Hubei Province in 1946

作　　者：李晓溪[1] 苗朝阳 LI Xiaoxi;MIAO Chaoyang(School of History and Culture,Hubei University,Wuhan Hubei,430062,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北大学历史文化学院,湖北武汉430062

出　　处：《安庆师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期95-102,共8页Journal of Anqing Normal University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：1946年位于鄂北地区的应山县发生了一起县长陈汉雄捕杀县参议员黄克的恶性案件。通过对案件所留原始档案的梳理可以看出,彼时县长权力呈现集中与加强的趋势,县参议会与党团力量本应与县府权力相互监督,而实际则是县长集行政、立法、司法、监督权于一身,使得参议会等难以对县长权力进行有效监督与制约,二者甚至在县域内进行权力的角逐,陈汉雄案鱼死网破式的结局,正是这一矛盾激化的表现。管窥此案可知,国民政府的制度设计与地方执政现实相距甚远,其在内战压力下的制度异化,也使其“地方自治”离民主之路愈走愈远。In 1946,a vicious case occurred in Yingshan County of northern Hubei Province,in which the county magistrate Chen Hanxiong killed county senator Huang Ke.By combing the original files left by the case,we can see that the county magistrate's power was centralized and strengthened at that time.The county Senate and the party group should have supervised each other with the county government's power,but in fact,the county magistrate integrated the administrative,legislative,judicial and supervisory powers,which made it difficult for the Senate and others to effectively supervise and restrict the county magistrate's power.They even competed and struggled for power within the county.The tragic ending of Chen Hanxiong's case is the manifestation of this intensified contradiction.From this case,we can see that the system design of the national government is far from the reality of local governance,and its system alienation under the pressure of civil war also makes its"local autonomy"farther and farther away from the road of democracy.

关 键 词：县权结构 县长权力 县参议会 党团权力 

分 类 号：K266[历史地理—历史学]