“革命文学”论争中鲁迅的“转变”问题  

Lu Xun’s“Transformation”Issue in the Debate on“Revolutionary Literature”

作　　者：王锡荣[1] WANG Xi-rong

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学人文学院

出　　处：《河北学刊》2024年第5期115-122,共8页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2022年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国现代左翼文学研究”(22BZW144)。

摘　　要：历来对于鲁迅在“革命文学”论争中究竟是“转变”还是“发展”,莫衷一是。对此两种观点的表述加以分析考察,可以发现,各有其理由,而又各有其偏颇。以外在表现观之,似是跳跃,而从内在逻辑观之,则有其一贯性。故从总体上看,是发展而非转变,但发展中有扬弃,有厘清以至“飞跃”,故仍有“转变”,但并非“方向转换”。从鲁迅个人来看,还是一种出于自身发展逻辑的必然,再加上时代条件的变迁所给予的机遇,使他迅速从革命民主主义者发展为马克思主义者,其间没有发生方向性的转换或本质性的改变,更没有政治态度与立场的改变,考虑到“转变”一词在当时具有一种特殊含义,故用“发展”说更为合理和合适。There has always been a debate on whether Lu Xun experienced a“transformation”or“development”during the debate on“revolutionary literature”.Analyzing these two perspectives reveals that both have their reasons as well as their biases.Viewed from external manifestations,it appears to be a leap,but from an internal logical perspective,it shows consistency.Therefore,overall,it is more of a development rather than a transformation,though development includes rejection and clarification,even leading to a“leap”,implying some degree of transformation but not a change in direction.For Lu Xun personally,it was a natural progression according to his own development logic,combined with the opportunities provided by the changing times,which allowed him to quickly evolve from a revolutionary democrat to a marxist.During this period,there was no directional change or fundamental alteration,nor was there a shift in his political attitude or stance.Considering the special connotation of the term“transformation”at that time,the term“development”is more reasonable and appropriate.

关 键 词：鲁迅 转变 革命文学 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]