宗法相定义中的限制词与三段论的小前提诸规则之比较研究  

A Preliminary Comparison Between The Restrictive Words In The Sexual Phase Of The Paksadharmatvam And The Small Preconditions And Rules Of Syllogism.

作　　者：多杰吉 达哇 Rdo-rje-skyabs;Zla-ba

机构地区：[1]青海民族大学藏学院

出　　处：《攀登（藏文版）》2024年第2期37-51,共15页

摘　　要：宗法相和小前提是因三相与三段论的重要组成部分。在一定程度上,两者直接联系到如何判定一个论证是否合乎逻辑的基本规则与通过前提(理由)能否推断出正确结论的关键所在。由于宗法相与小前提的思维方式近乎接近,因此有因明学者强调两者除了语言结构和思维顺序不同之外,并无大的区别之论。实际上不能因两者的局部相似性而把宗法相与小前提曲解为“体同面异”的关系,尤其要依据宗法相定义中体现的相对性、辩论性、具体细节性等角度看三段论小前提之规则可知,宗法相与小前提之间不仅存在相同之处,更是呈现了理论本身的特点和差异。For both the Paksadharmatvam and the minor premise,they are important components of the Trairupya and syllogism.It can also be said that this issue is directly related to the nature of the formula(positive or Quasi reason)and the key to whether the correct conclusion can be inferred from the premise.In addition,due to Quasi reason such as the way of thinking between Paksadharmatvam and minor premises,some scholars in the academic community emphasize that Paksadharmatvam and minor premises are essentially the same except for their differences in language structure and order of thinking.Here,the author further compares the rules of various restrictive words and minor premises in the definition of Paksadharmatvam.It can be seen that whether it is Paksadharmatvam or the minor premises in the form of syllogism,whether they are judged according to objective basis and standards,not only have similarities,but also reflect the characteristics of the theory itself.

关 键 词：宗法相 小前提 相同点 差异 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]