检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯强强[1] 郄海巍 王文海[1] 周凤云 程晓光[1] 徐黎[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院,北京100035
出 处:《中国骨与关节杂志》2024年第8期580-583,共4页Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint
摘 要:目的通过对比EOS成像系统(EOS imaging system),来评估全幅数字X线摄影(the full view digital radiography,DR)图像所测量下肢力线的准确性。方法本研究为前瞻性研究。对同一个膝关节骨关节炎患者在同一天分别使用全幅DR和EOS成像系统进行下肢全长检查并测量下肢力线。结果共纳入27例,其中男6例,女21例。年龄48~80岁,平均(63.67±7.68)岁。所有研究对象分左、右下肢分别测量,共54例。下肢力线的测量在全幅DR和EOS成像系统两种检查方法,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),其中髋膝踝角(hip-knee-ankle angle,HKA)的P值为0.331,股骨远端外侧角(lateral distal femoral angle,LDFA)的P值为0.140,胫骨近端内侧角(medial proximal tibial angle,MPTA)的P值为0.359,股骨胫骨关节线夹角(joint line convergence angle,JLCA)的P值为0.974。结论全幅DR虽然存在边缘放大效应,但对于下肢力线测量的影响较小。Objective To evaluate the accuracy of lower limb force lines measured in full view DR images by comparing EOS imaging systems.Methods This study was a prospective study.A full view DR and EOS imaging systems were used to perform a full-length examination of the lower limb and measure the lower limb force line for the same patient with knee osteoarthritis.Results A total of 27 patients was included(6 males and 21 females).The age ranged from 48 to 80 years old,with an average of(63.67±7.68)years.All research subjects were measured separately for the left and right lower limbs,with a total of 54 cases.There was no statistically signifcant difference in the measurement of lower limb force line between the full-range DR and EOS imaging systems(P>0.05).The P-value of hip-knee-ankle was 0.331,the P-value of lateral distal femoral angle was 0.140,the P-value of medial proximal tibial angle was 0.359 and the P-value of joint line convergence angle was 0.974.Conclusions Although full view DR has edge amplifcation effect,its impact on lower limb force line measurement is relatively small.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42