检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐康 XU Kang
机构地区:[1]国能江苏电力工程技术有限公司,江苏镇江212006
出 处:《化工设计通讯》2024年第8期119-122,共4页Chemical Engineering Design Communications
摘 要:目前国内火力发电厂机组脱硝普遍采用低氮燃烧器+选择性催化还原(SCR)工艺,以往脱硝还原剂通常为液氨,属于重大危险源。随着安全环保要求的日益提高,需要对制氨工艺进行改造,消除重大危险源。以某火力发电厂的相关改造工程为例介绍了尿素制氨的两种常用工艺,通过对两种工艺方案的投资和运行成本对比得出最优方案,并对改造前后的经济和社会效益进行了分析。本文的研究方法和结论对其他类似改造工程具有良好的借鉴和参考意义。At present,the process of low nitrogen burner and selective catalytic reduction(SCR)is widely used in denitration of thermal power plants in china.In the past,the reductant for denitration was usually liquid ammonia,which was a major hazard source.With the increasing requirements of safety and environmental protection,it is necessary to reform the ammonia production process to eliminate major hazards.In this paper,two common processes of ammonia production from urea are introduced by taking the reconstruction project of a thermal power plant as an example.By comparing the investment and operating cost of the two processes,the optimal scheme is obtained,and the economic and social benefits before and after the reconstruction are analyzed.the research methods and conclusions in this paper have good reference significance for other similar reconstruction projects.
分 类 号:X773[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15