证据开示制度的价值证成与实现路径——兼论《指导意见》第29条  

The Value Justification and Realization Path of the Evidence Disclosure System:With a Discussion on Arrttiiccle 29 of the “Guiding Opinions”

作　　者：孙欣然 黄荣昌 Sun Xin-ran;Huang Rong-chang(Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou Gansu 730070)

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法大学,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《河西学院学报》2024年第4期87-94,共8页Journal of Hexi University

摘　　要：证据开示具有确保实体公正基础上促进案件真实发现,提升诉讼效率基础上保障被追诉人人权理念以及完善程序结构基础上协调控辩双方平等对抗等价值功能。然而,这些价值功能的实现在认罪认罚从宽司法实践中却面临着缺乏专门立法规定,可操作性不强、缺乏具体程序性规制以及救济制裁机制缺失等一系列亟待解决的现实困境。对此,应当糅合并完善相关专门立法规定,总结并汲取司法实践有益成果,明确开示程序性规制和健全救济制裁机制,从而在刑事实体认定上保证相关法律政策适用过程的公正合理性与真实准确性,减少冤假错案发生的潜在可能,发挥认罪认罚从宽制度应有的制度价值。Evidence disclosure plays a crucial role in ensuring substantive justice by promoting the true discovery of cases,enhancing litigation efficiency while protecting the rights of the accused,and coordinating equal adversarial proceedings between prosecution and defense through improved procedural structures.However,the realization of these values faces a series of urgent challenges in the judicial practice of leniency for guilty pleas and confessions,including a lack of specialized legislative provisions,limited operability,insufficient procedural regulations,and the absence of remedial and sanction mechanisms.To address these issues,it is necessary to integrate and improve relevant specialized legislative provisions,summarize and learn from beneficial outcomes in judicial practice,clarify procedural regulations for disclosure,and establish comprehensive remedial and sanction mechanisms.This will ensure the fairness and accuracy of the application of relevant legal policies in criminal substantive determinations,reduce the potential for wrongful convictions,and realize the intended value of the leniency system for guilty pleas and confessions.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 证据开示 价值证成 实现路径 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]