西方人类学边界研究述评  

A Review of Border Studies in Western Anthropology

作　　者：刘玺鸿 包智明 Xihong Liu;Zhiming Bao

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学社会学院,贵阳550025

出　　处：《世界民族》2024年第4期11-23,共13页Journal of World Peoples Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“民族地区生态文明建设的社会文化机制研究”(20ASH014);贵州民族大学基金博士科研启动项目“西南边疆地区抵边村跨境通道开发利用与安边固边兴边调查研究”(GZMUSK[2024]QD54)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：在人类学理论和方法的持续影响下,传统边界研究转型并发展出一个重要的跨学科细分领域——人类学边界研究。该领域从萌芽到成型历经三个阶段。20世纪60年代以来人类学对“文化”与“边界”之间逻辑关系的转变使边界从研究前提转为研究问题,为该领域兴起奠定了理念基础。20世纪80年代以来传统边界研究对人类学的吸收促成从“边界”到“边界化”的研究范式转型,边界研究的本体论与认识论得以更新。在前两个阶段基础上,近十年来,边界化研究范式在“政治批判”和“伦理关怀”的拓展中进一步吸收并凸显了民族志方法,人类学边界研究由此成型。Under the continuous influence of anthropological theories and methods,the traditional border research has transformed itself and developed an important interdisciplinary subdivision:anthropological border studies.This field has gone through three development stages from inception to formation:First of all,the transformation of the logical relationship between"culture"and"border"in anthropology since the 1960s has transformed the border from a research premise to a research subject,thus laying the conceptual foundation for the rise of this field.Secondly,the absorption of anthropology by traditional border studies since the 1980s has promoted the shift of research paradigm from"border"to"borderization",hence updating the ontology and epistemology of border studies.Finally,in the past decade,the border research paradigm has further absorbed and highlighted the ethnographic approach in the expansion of"political criticism"and"ethical concern",thus bringing about the formation of anthropological border studies.

关 键 词：人类学 边界 文化 边界化 主体性 

分 类 号：C912.4[经济管理]