检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨艳 丁正山[2] 邵海雁[2] 穆学青 杜钟婧 葛军莲 YANG Yan;DING Zhengshan;SHAO Haiyan;MU Xueqing;DU Zhongjing;GE Junlian(School of Economics and Management,Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology,Nanjing 210023,China;School of Geography,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China;Tourism Management Teaching and Research Office,Hu Bei Sheng Lv You Xue Xiao,Wuhan 430079,China)
机构地区:[1]南京工业职业技术大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210023 [2]南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏南京210023 [3]湖北省旅游学校旅游管理教研室,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《资源开发与市场》2024年第9期1420-1430,共11页Resource Development & Market
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:42271235);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金项目(编号:2019SJA0611);江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度课题(编号:C-c/2021/03/79);江苏省高职院校教师专业带头人高端研修项目(编号:2020GRGDYX008);南工校本教育研究重点课题(编号:ZBZD21-02)。
摘 要:乡村振兴(RR)-乡村旅游(RT)-生态环境(EE)是相互支撑、相互促进的有机统一整体,如何保证三者之间的协调发展已成为中国实现乡村可持续发展亟待解决的重要问题。以长江经济带9省2市为研究区域,基于耦合协调机理构建评价指标体系,运用ESDA、核密度估计、泰尔指数等方法测度2005-2021年三大系统的综合发展指数、耦合协调度及时空演化差异。结果显示:①长江经济带RR、RT和EE指数表现各异但均为增长态势,在综合发展水平上呈现出RR>EE>RT的总体趋势,大体表现为RR超前,RT与EE滞后;②三大系统从高耦合、低协调向高耦合、高协调转变,且协调度从严重失调向优质协调稳步推进,空间上呈现出上-中-下游逐渐上升的阶梯分布态势,各地区都在不同时期出现高值集聚;③核密度曲线显示长江经济带协调程度显著提升,空间上呈现出明显的非均衡性,泰尔指数显示空间差异下降明显,提升长江经济带协调水平的关键在于缩小上-中-下游的区内差异。Rural revitalization(RR),rural tourism(RT),and ecological environment(EE)constitute an interconnected and mutually supportive organic whole.Ensuring coordinated development among these three elements has become a crucial issue for achieving sustainable rural development in China.This paper focused on nine provinces and two cities within the Yangtze River Economic Belt as the research area.This paper constructed an evaluation framework based on the mechanism of coupling and coordination,and employed methods such as exploratory spatial data analysis(ESDA),kernel density estimation,and Theil index to measure the comprehensive development indices,coupling coordination degrees,and spatio-temporal evolution differences of the three systems from 2005 to 2021.The results showed that:①The RR,RT,and EE indices in the Yangtze River Economic Belt had shown varying degrees of growth.In terms of overall development,a trend of RR>EE>RT was observed,with RR leading the way and RT and EE lagging behind.②The three systems had transformed from a state of high coupling and low coordination to one of high coupling and high coordination.The degree of coordination had steadily improved from severe misalignment to high-quality coordination.Spatially,a gradual upward trend was observed from upstream to midstream and then to downstream,with clusters of high values emerging in various regions at different times.③The kernel density curve indicated a significant improvement in the coordination level within the Yangtze River Economic Belt,accompanied by apparent spatial imbalances.The Theil index suggested a notable reduction in spatial disparities.The key to enhancing the coordination level within the Yangtze River Economic Belt lied in narrowing the intra-regional differences among upstream,midstream,and downstream areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30