重大国家战略区域新质生产力的水平测度及差异分析  

Measurement and differential analysis of new quality productivity in major national strategic regions

作　　者：刘建华 闫静[1] 王慧扬 葛世帅 LIU Jianhua;YAN Jing;WANG Huiyang;GE Shishuai(School of Management,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,P.R.China;Research Center of City Development,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,P.R.China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学管理学院,河南郑州450001 [2]郑州大学城市发展研究中心,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第4期79-90,共12页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展协同推进研究”(21FGLB092);河南省软科学重大项目“建立健全社会主义市场经济条件下关键核心技术攻关新型举国体制河南路径探索”(242400411004)。

摘　　要：新一轮科技革命和产业变革正加速演进,对生产力提出了新的要求。2023年习近平总书记创造性地提出“新质生产力”这一概念,并在一系列论述中重点强调因地制宜、分类施策发展新质生产力。新质生产力作为传统生产力的质态跃迁,符合当前我国推进高质量发展和中国式现代化的内在要求。围绕新质生产力的内涵特征、提升路径等理论研究逐渐深入,但实证研究仍显不足。重大国家战略区域是我国经济建设和发展新质生产力的先行区,对重大国家战略区域新质生产力发展现状和区域差异的准确研判,是我国因地制宜,协同发展、错位发展、联动发展新质生产力的前提条件,对于我国加快新质生产力协调发展具有重要现实意义。通过梳理新质生产力的内涵特点,构建涵盖新产业、新模式、新动能三个维度的新质生产力评价指标体系,在此基础上利用熵值TOPSIS法测度2012-2021年重大国家战略区域新质生产力水平,探究其时空演进特征,进一步利用基尼系数剖析其新质生产力发展差异及来源,并探究各地区新动能、新产业、新模式三个维度的增长差异。研究发现:其一,重大国家战略区域新质生产力水平持续提升,从高到低依次为粤港澳、长三角、京津冀、长江经济带、黄河流域。在年均增速上,京津冀表现相对落后。其二,重大国家战略区域新质生产力空间分布不均,呈阶梯状特征,其中,第一梯队以粤港澳、北京和长三角两省一市等发达地区为核心,新质生产力水平显著领先,第二梯队包括天津、长江经济带及黄河流域的部分省份,第三、第四梯队涵盖其他地区,新质生产力水平有待进一步提升。其三,重大国家战略区域内部新质生产力发展差异显著,其中,以京津冀地区的内部差异最为突出,而黄河流域内部差异呈逐步扩大趋势。其四,在新动能和新产业方面,粤港澳The accelerated evolution of a new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation has put forward new requirements for productivity.As a qualitative transition of traditional productivity,the new quality productivity meets the internal requirements of the current high-quality development and Chinese path to modernization.Theoretical research on the connotation characteristics and improvement paths of new quality productivity is gradually deepening,but empirical research is still insufficient.Major national strategic regions are the leading areas for China’s economic construction and development of new quality productivity.Accurate analysis of the current situation and regional differences in the development of new quality productivity in major national strategic regions is a prerequisite for China to adapt to local conditions,achieve coordinated,staggered,and linked development of new quality productivity.It is of great practical significance for China to accelerate the coordinated development of new quality productivity.By sorting out the connotation and characteristics of new quality productivity,a new quality productivity evaluation index system covering three dimensions of new industries,new models,and new kinetic energy is constructed.Based on this,the entropy TOPSIS method is used to measure the level of new quality productivity in major national strategic regions from 2012 to 2021,explore its spatiotemporal evolution characteristics,further analyze the development differences and sources of new quality productivity using Gini coefficient,and display and explore the growth differences of new kinetic energy,new industries,and new models in different regions.Research has found that:1)the level of new quality productivity in major national strategic regions continues to improve,from high to low,followed by Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao,the Yangtze River Delta,Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei,the Yangtze River Economic Belt,and the Yellow River Basin.In terms of annual growth rate,the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei

关 键 词：新质生产力 重大国家战略区域 水平测度 时空演化 区域差异 

分 类 号：F124[经济管理—世界经济] C93-03[经济管理—管理学] F061.1