检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁圆 任义坤 张玉文 Yuan Yuan;Ren Yikun;Zhang Yuwen(Northwest Research Institute of Engineering Investigations and Design,Xi’an 710003,China)
出 处:《黑龙江科学》2024年第16期86-89,共4页Heilongjiang Science
摘 要:根据现场地质勘察报告,利用Bishop条分法对案例边坡项目的稳定性进行分析,确定了边坡在天然工况下和暴雨工况下的安全系数分别为0.751、0.648,均小于规范要求的安全系数标准值1.00,说明该边坡稳定性较差。基于边坡稳定性分析结果,从施工安全性及经济性两方面对锚拉式桩板挡墙和排桩式锚杆挡墙支护方案进行对比优选,确定排桩式锚杆挡墙为边坡支护方案。According to the site geological investigation report,study analyzes the stability of the slope project in the case with Bishop’s segmentation method,and determines that the safety factors of the slope under natural conditions and rainstorm conditions are 0.751 and 0.648 respectively,both of which are lower than the standard value of 1.00 required by the code,indicating that the stability of the slope is poor.Based on the results of slope stability analysis,the bolting schemes of bolting pile retaining wall and bolting pile retaining wall are compared and optimized from construction safety and economy,and bolting pile retaining wall is determined as the bolting scheme of slope.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229