检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵李娜 Zhao Lina
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学传播学院
出 处:《上海文化》2024年第8期63-73,共11页Shanghai Culture
摘 要:若要深刻认知当今持续出现的“家庭民俗志”,对其进行民族志诗学批评非常必要。人类学“写文化”思潮下民族志主要由具有批判性眼光的学术共同体所评估,完整作品应有“作者反思”相关内容。家庭民俗志的“作者自反性”应包涵:(1)是否在文中承认书写对象为自己家庭(家族、家人);(2)对“以自己家人为对象”是否展开伦理反思。选取若干相关作品进行文本分析,发现大多数作者明确承认写作对象为自己家庭,其“坦诚”呈现“由隐到明”表达态势;田野伦理反思层面由于学术论著体裁类型差异,写作者相关话语文本展现“反身性”的多元化特征。通过蠡析以上作品中的作者自反性,能认识“家庭民俗学/志”诞生初期的模糊游移情态。随着相关写作实践增多,其游移性渐趋退却,标志着此民俗志新范式的实际存在与被“看见”。It is necessary to conduct criticism of ethnographic poetics on the ongoing"family ethnography"in order to gain a profound understanding of it.While the"writing culture"is mainly evaluated by academic communities with critical perspectives,complete works should have content related to"author's reflexivity".The"author's reflexivity"in family ethnography should include:firstly,whether the writing object is recognized as one's own family(family,members of the family)in the text;secondly,whether to conduct ethical reflection on"targeting one's own family".Taking several works as examples,we find that most authors explicitly acknowledge that the writing object is their own family,and their"honesty"presents a trend"from being hidden to explicit".As for ethical reflection,the texts exhibit diverse characteristics of reflexivity due to different academic genres.As a result,the vague and wandering nature of reflexivity in the early texts of"family ethnography"gradually fades away with the increase of related writing practices,indicating the actual existence and being"seen"of this new paradigm of folk chronicles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188