检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王梦晨 WANG Meng-chen(School of Marxism,Fudan University,200433,Shanghai,China)
出 处:《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第4期50-57,共8页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:党的十八大以来,党政联合发文作为一种既成的制度规范,其数量激增,但在实践运行中涉及备案审查、信息公开时的“归属”问题却饱受争议。为此,国内学界从其发展历程、党政关系、党规与国法、规范适用等维度剖析党政联合发文的性质属性,基本形成了“单一属性论”“双重属性论”“复合属性论”和“回避论”四种分析态势。但任何一种分析态势都难免具有局限性,亟需不断结合理论和实践对其进行反思和完善。基于此,该文将党政联合发文置于特定语境之下,明确其理论前提,结合动态的实践,探讨“属性论”可分析范式的突破。Since the 18th NationalCongress of the Communist Party of China,the number of party-government joint publications,as an established institutional norm,has increased sharply.However,in practice,the issue of"attribution"when it comes to record review and information disclosure has been controversial.For this reason,the domestic academic circles have analyzed the nature and attributes of the joint publication of the Party and the government from the dimensions of its development process,party-government relationship,party regulations and national laws,and normative application,basically forming the four analytical situations of"single attribute theory","dual attribute theory",and"composite attribute theory"and"avoidance".However,any analysis situation inevitably has limitations,and it is urgent to continuously reflect on and improve it by combining theory and practice.Based on these,this article puts the joint party-government document in a specific context,clarifies its theoretical premise,and explores breakthroughs in the analyzable paradigm of"attribute theories"based on dynamic practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117