检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张朝枝[1] 李子帅 ZHANG Chaozhi;LI Zhishuai(The Department of Tourism,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China;School of Tourism Management,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,Guangdong,China)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学旅游学系,中国上海200433 [2]中山大学旅游学院,中国广东广州510275
出 处:《经济地理》2024年第7期206-213,共8页Economic Geography
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(42071181)。
摘 要:文章以广东丹霞山风景区内6个村落为研究对象,通过现场观察和对88位农户的访谈,分析了资源保护背景下农户生计策略选择的影响因素及其作用机制。研究发现:①资源保护对旅游地农户生计策略选择产生显著影响。主要表现为资源保护加强时,旅游生计策略选择减少,外出务工生计策略选择增加;当资源保护适中时,农户生计相对多元化,传统生计策略选择相对较高。②在资源保护背景下,由于可供选择生计资本有限,家户的生计策略选择更容易受资源保护政策执行程度和农户的个人与家庭情感因素、社会资本等因素影响。③在资源保护背景下,农户的生计策略选择机制与以往DFID的分析框架相比,应该更注重对农户个体及家庭的情感因素、社会资本等因素的考虑。同时,文章关注到脆弱性背景的异质性以及农户生计策略选择影响因素的多样性与动态性,将个人—家庭—社会的关系纳入生计策略分析框架中,有利于更全面地分析居民的生计策略选择机制和指导自然保护地的社区管理实践。Taking six villages in Danxia Mountain scenic area of Guangdong as the research area,this paper analyzes the impact of resource protection on the livelihood strategy choices of farmers and its impact mechanism based on the field observations and interviews with 88 local farmers.The study concludes that:1)Resource conservation has a significant impact on the livelihood strategy choices of tourism-dependent rural households.When resource conservation is strengthened,the choice of tourism livelihood strategy decreases,while the choice of migrant worker livelihood strategy increases.When resource conservation is moderate,rural households tend to have more diversified livelihoods,their choice of traditional livelihood strategy is relatively high.2)In the context of resource conservation,due to limited available livelihood capital,the livelihood strategy choices of households are more easily influenced by the degree of implementation of resource conservation policies,emotional factors between individual and family,as well as social capital factors.3)In the context of resource conservation,the livelihood strategy choice mechanism of rural households should,compared to previous DFID analysis frameworks,place more emphasis on considering factors such as emotional factors between individual and household,and social capital.This study pays attention to the heterogeneity of vulnerability contexts,and the diversity and dynamics of factors influencing the livelihood strategy choices of rural households.At the same time,by incorporating the relationships between individuals,families,and society into the analytical framework of livelihood strategies,it is conducive to a more comprehensive analysis of the mechanism of residents'livelihood strategy choices and guiding the management practice of protected area communities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.55.224