检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周智琦 ZHOU Zhiq
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院
出 处:《武大国际法评论》2024年第3期20-33,共14页Wuhan University International Law Review
基 金:国家社科基金后期资助项目“国际数字经济规则建构中的个人信息保护研究”(21FFXB073)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:在全球数字治理进程中,区域贸易协定下的数字经贸规则在推动数字法治的同时,受制于其孤岛化与碎片化的固有特性,难以避免地围绕着区域贸易主导国的经济诉求,相继形成区域性的数字贸易规则模板。数字产品非歧视待遇领域也不例外,无论是独立条款下的美式规制模式,还是普通条款下的欧式规制模式,其规则偏好的本质都是国家利益诉求的差异化。因此,当我国面对这两种截然相反的规制进路时,结合条款本身的前瞻性与国家数字经济发展战略,可以得出我国应当选择独立的数字产品非歧视待遇条款的结论,并通过例外条款的具体适用分析,实现对数字产品开放与保护并济的双重目标。In the process of global digital governance,the digital economic and trade rules under regional trade agreements,while promoting the digital rule of law,are subject to their inherent characteristics of islanding and fragmentation,and inevitably form regional digital trade rule templates based on the economic de-mands of leading regional trade countries.The field of non-discriminatory treatment of digital products is no exception,whether it is the American template under the independent terms,or the European template under the ordinary terms,the essence of the preference of the rules is the differentiation of national interest demands.Therefore,when China is faced with these two diametrically opposite regulatory ap-proaches,combining the forward-looking provisions and the national digital econo-my development strategy,we can draw the conclusion that China should choose an independent non-discriminatory treatment clause for digital products,and achieve the dual goals of opening up and protecting digital products and economy through the specific application of the exception clause.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.200.134