护理英语学术论文写作能力与写作自我效能评价工具的范围综述  

A scoping review of the evaluation tools for scholarly writing in nursing

作　　者：赵小磊 李利平 李杨 杨霞 王雪 谭逢梅 ZHAO Xiaolei;LI Liping;LI Yang;YANG Xia;WANG Xue;TAN Fengmei(The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou 646000,China)

机构地区：[1]西南医科大学附属医院血液内科,泸州646000

出　　处：《当代护士（上旬刊）》2024年第9期16-23,共8页Modern Nurse

摘　　要：目的对国内外护理英语学术论文写作能力和自我效能评价工具进行综述,为我国护理英语学术论文写作质量评价工具的选择提供参考依据。方法通过计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、EBSCO、Scopus、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库,检索时间为建库至2022年10月31日。结果共纳入38篇文献。筛选出适合护理英语学术论文写作能力评价、经过信度、效度检测的评价工具6个;筛选出适合本科及以上学历学生的写作自我效能量表15个,其中4个量表已被用于护理本科学生中,5个量表适合将英语作为外语的本科生。大部分写作自我效能量表是基于Bandura的自我效能理论和社会认知理论编制的。结论研究者应根据研究对象、量表本土化检测等因素选择合适的量表,并对量表在护理研究生或护理人员等人群中的信度、效度进行进一步验证,以加强对量表心理测量学特征的审查。Objective To review the evaluation tools of scholarly writing ability and self-efficacy in nursing,which would provide reference to the objective evaluation of scholarly writing for nursing students.Methods PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,EBSCO,Scopus,Web of Science,and Chinese databases CNKI and Wanfang were systematically searched from the establishment of the databases to October 31,2022.Results A total of 38 articles were included.Six scales to assess academic paper writing ability in English were selected,including rubric and checklist,which were suitable for nursing students.There were 15 English academic writing self-efficacy scales suitable for nursing students,most of which were based on Bandura′s self-efficacy theory and social cognitive theory.Conclusion Compared with nursing students in Western countries,those in China perform poorly in English with higher requirements for academic writing.Therefore,researchers could choose appropriate evaluation tools for scholarly writing,and further test the psychological indicators in nursing students in China.

关 键 词：学术写作 写作能力评价 写作自我效能 范围综述 

分 类 号：H319.3[语言文字—英语] R47-4[医药卫生—护理学]