基于数字化描述的烤烟中部叶外观质量评价方法研究  

Evaluation Indicator System of Appearance Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco Based on Digital Description

作　　者：吴元华[1] 刘光亮[1] 刘阳 罗忠锋[3] 李艾燃 宋文静[1] 陶德欣[4] 王程栋[1] 包自超 尚斌 WU Yuanhua;LIU Guangliang;LIU Yang;LUO Zhongfeng;LI Airan;SONG Wenjing;TAO Dexin;WANG Chengdong;BAO Zichao;SHANG Bin(Tobacco Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Qingdao,Shandong 266101;Yichang City Company of Hubei Tobacco Company,Yichang,Hubei 443100;Xingshan Marketing Department of Shiyan Tobacco Company,Xingshan,Hubei 443700;Hubei Tobacco Company,Wuhan,430030;The Limited Company of Shandong Tabacco Research Institute,Jinan 250100;China Tobacco Shangdong Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Jinan 250100)

机构地区：[1]中国农业科学院烟草研究所,山东青岛266101 [2]湖北烟草公司宜昌市公司,湖北宜昌443100 [3]湖北省烟草公司宜昌市公司兴山营销部,湖北兴山443700 [4]湖北省烟草公司,武汉430000 [5]山东省烟草研究院有限公司,济南250100 [6]山东中烟股份有限责任公司,济南250100

出　　处：《中国农学通报》2024年第22期158-164,共7页Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin

基　　金：湖北省烟草公司科技项目“以全程机械化为基础的烟草农业生产方式转型升级研究”(027Y2021-012);中国农业科学院“科技创新工程”(ASTIP-TRIC03)。

摘　　要：为阐明不同典型生态区烟叶外观质量特征及区域间差异,跟踪了2019—2021年11个典型生态区46个县的230个试验点的烟叶样品,通过构建“刻度尺”模式外观质量数字化描述评价方法,对不同生态区中部烟叶样品进行评价。结果表明,烤烟外观质量指标间存在极显著相关关系,不同区域间外观质量差异较明显,其中武夷山区和皖南山区单项指标和综合评价分值较高,其次是云贵高原、南岭山区、秦巴山区、东北产区、中原产区;黔中山、武陵山区、鲁中山区、雪峰山区整体品质偏低。年际间比较,2019年与2020、2021年单项指标和综合评价差异较明显,2020年与2021年际间无明显差异,样品质量较稳定。In order to investigate the tobacco leaf appearance quality characteristics and regional differences in different typical ecological areas,the samples of tobacco leaf from 230 experimental sites in 46 counties of 11 typical ecological areas were selected in 2019 to 2021.The tobacco leaves from middle position of plant were evaluated by constructing a‘calibrated scale’digital description model.The results showed that there was a significant correlation between flue-cured tobacco appearance quality indices,with obvious differences between different regions.Among them,Wuyi mountain area and Southern Anhui mountain area had higher evaluation scores both in individual and comprehensive indices,followed by Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau,Nanling Mountain area,Qinba Mountain area,Northeast China and Central China producing area.The overall quality of Zhongshan of Guizhou,Wuling,Central Shandong and Xuefeng mountainous areas was lower than other areas.Inter annual comparison showed significant differences in individual indicators and comprehensive evaluations between 2019,2020 and 2021,while there was no significant difference between 2020 and 2021.The sample quality was relatively stable.

关 键 词：烤烟 中部叶 外观质量 评价指标 数字化描述 

分 类 号：S572[农业科学—烟草工业]