检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪明亮[1] Wang Mingliang
机构地区:[1]复旦大学法学院
出 处:《中国应用法学》2024年第4期49-58,共10页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
摘 要:经济犯罪已呈现主流犯罪倾向,其司法适用需要在防范经济风险、促进经济发展、保护企业家等方面寻求平衡。剖析经济犯罪司法适用中的新特点,并以此为基础,从理念与措施两个层面寻求司法应对策略,极为迫切。若干经济犯罪自然犯趋向显现、刑民交叉案件激增、受政策影响明显等是当前经济犯罪司法适用中的新特点。谦抑有度、破“三唯”与突显社会效果是司法应对经济犯罪应坚持的理念;公众认同、过程管控、依法独立行使审判权是司法应对经济犯罪的常规措施,法益恢复、以刑制罪、企业托管是司法应对经济犯罪的新创措施。Economic crime has shown the mainstream criminal tendency.The application of criminal law of economic crime needs to seek balance in preventing economic risk,promoting economic development and protecting entrepreneurs.It is very urgent to analyze the new characteristics of the judicial application of economic crimes,and on this basis,to seek judicial countermeasures from the two levels of ideas and measures.New characteristics in the judicial application process of economic crime are the tendency of natural crimes,the surge of the intersection of criminal and civil cases,and the obvious influence of policies.Combining leniency with severity,breaking the"Three factors"and the double effects are the ideas that the judiciary should adhere to when dealing with economic crimes.Public recognition,restoration of legal interests,penalty influencing conviction,enterprise trusteeship,process control and independent trial are the important measures of judicial response to economic crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.132.79